Commenters debate whether science adequately answers 'why' questions
4 Sep 18 7:39 AM · 5d ago · 3 comments · 1 source · development 4 of 4
A thread of discussion emerged about whether physics can and should answer fundamental 'why' questions, with some commenters arguing physics answers only 'what' and 'how,' while others suggest 'why' explanations ultimately reduce to mechanism descriptions.
“Yes, i have always hated this about physics. It is the only scientific field that apparently feels no responsibility to explain "why", deciding that "what" is sufficient.”
daishi55the__alchemist Article author/postercosmicave.org author Cosmological theorist
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 3 voices · verbatim
-
I found the article fascinating because it 'resonates' with my own personal truth.I don't have the math background or a big enough brain to hold so many ideas, and equations, and relationships between all three, to come up with any kind of scientific explanation for why I believe what I believe.The author seems to have it though.Classic thinkers…
-
I am absolutely certain that I read this same blog post on a 1990s geocities-style page, or nearly identical in content and prose. I know this because I even showed it to my high school Astronomy teacher, who found it equally fascinating for entirely different reasons: I gave him a peek inside the wacky rabbit hole of the World Wide Web and he…
-
It is an unknown person for me that wrote something on the internet.Why do you need to spell it out like that?
All 4 developments of Cosmicave essay challenges standard cosmology's explanation… →
Hacker NewsNewswires