Waterluvian reports immediate performance degradation versus Friday evening
4 Sep 21 1:04 PM · 4d ago · 1 comment · 1 source · development 4 of 6
A commenter describes noticing something wrong with Fable 5 compared to Friday evening, citing a specific incident where the model duplicated a method it was asked to delete, then acknowledged the error. The user also notes increased "thinking" time for previously simple tasks.
“I have no hard data but I have a strong feeling this morning that something's wrong with Fable 5 compared to Friday evening.”
WaterluvianWaterluvian Fable 5 userjotato gpt-5.6-luna usermlmonkey Frontier model researchertheplumber Claude userrcr-anti Claude Code tracker
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
I have no hard data but I have a strong feeling this morning that something's wrong with Fable 5 compared to Friday evening.Just an hour ago I had Fable correctly identify an unused method that could be deleted. I then immediately get a diff for an exact duplicate method, and then Fable outputting, "I accidentally duplicated <method> instead of…
All 6 developments of Users report Fable 5 performance decline weeks after launch →
Hacker NewsNewswiresMastodon