AI
AI inference costs plunge 725-fold in 18 months, Epoch AI report shows
Tabarrok details cost decline with specific model comparison
2
Sep 23 9:08 AM
· 2d ago · 1 article · 2 posts · 1 comment · 3 sources · development 2 of 5
The post highlights a concrete example: OpenAI o3 cost $0.30 per question to achieve 75% accuracy on GPQA Diamond in January 2025, while GPT-5.6 Luna achieved roughly the same score for $0.0004 in mid-2026—a 725-fold decline in under 18 months. Tabarrok argues frontier models are both smarter and cheaper to run at any performance level.
marginalrevolution.com
“OpenAI o3 cost about $0.30/question to attain 75% on GPQA Diamond in January 2025, while GPT-5.6 Luna attained roughly the same score for $0.0004 in mid-2026—a roughly 725-fold decline in under 18 months.”
Alex Tabarrok
Alex Tabarrok Economist, Marginal Revolution blogger Epoch AI Research organization OpenAI AI company
The whole story articles posts
the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
Peak 4 pieces in one hour at Sep 23, 8 AM; 18 pieces over 3 days (2 articles · 2 posts · 14 comments)
Sep 23, 6 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1 Sep 23, 7 AM — quiet Sep 23, 8 AM — 4 pieces · 1 article · 2 posts · 1 comment — Hacker News 2, Mastodon 1, Newswires 1 Sep 23, 9 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Hacker News 4 Sep 23, 10 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Hacker News 4 Sep 23, 11 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Hacker News 4 Sep 23, 12 PM — quiet Sep 23, 1 PM — quiet Sep 23, 2 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1 Sep 23, 3 PM — quiet Sep 23, 4 PM — quiet Sep 23, 5 PM — quiet Sep 23, 6 PM — quiet Sep 23, 7 PM — quiet Sep 23, 8 PM — quiet Sep 23, 9 PM — quiet Sep 23, 10 PM — quiet Sep 23, 11 PM — quiet Sep 24, 12 AM — quiet Sep 24, 1 AM — quiet Sep 24, 2 AM — quiet Sep 24, 3 AM — quiet Sep 24, 4 AM — quiet Sep 24, 5 AM — quiet Sep 24, 6 AM — quiet Sep 24, 7 AM — quiet Sep 24, 8 AM — quiet Sep 24, 9 AM — quiet Sep 24, 10 AM — quiet Sep 24, 11 AM — quiet Sep 24, 12 PM — quiet Sep 24, 1 PM — quiet Sep 24, 2 PM — quiet Sep 24, 3 PM — quiet Sep 24, 4 PM — quiet Sep 24, 5 PM — quiet Sep 24, 6 PM — quiet Sep 24, 7 PM — quiet Sep 24, 8 PM — quiet Sep 24, 9 PM — quiet Sep 24, 10 PM — quiet Sep 24, 11 PM — quiet Yesterday, 12 AM — quiet Yesterday, 1 AM — quiet Yesterday, 2 AM — quiet Yesterday, 3 AM — quiet Yesterday, 4 AM — quiet Yesterday, 5 AM — quiet Yesterday, 6 AM — quiet Yesterday, 7 AM — quiet Yesterday, 8 AM — quiet Yesterday, 9 AM — quiet Yesterday, 10 AM — quiet Yesterday, 11 AM — quiet Yesterday, 12 PM — quiet Yesterday, 1 PM — quiet Yesterday, 2 PM — quiet Yesterday, 3 PM — quiet Yesterday, 4 PM — quiet Yesterday, 5 PM — quiet Yesterday, 6 PM — quiet Yesterday, 7 PM — quiet Yesterday, 8 PM — quiet Yesterday, 9 PM — quiet Yesterday, 10 PM — quiet Yesterday, 11 PM — quiet Today, 12 AM — quiet Today, 1 AM — quiet Today, 2 AM — quiet Today, 3 AM — quiet Today, 4 AM — quiet Today, 5 AM — quiet Today, 6 AM — quiet
1 2–5
Sep 24 yesterday now · 7:40 AM ET
Reported in the same hours
no headline names this development itself — these 1 claim were published in its stretch
first by HN Frontpage , 2d ago · also Marginal Revolution
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
S
Price of human intelligence is also falling rapidly. I suspect looking pretty is going to go up in value more rapidly.
All 5 developments of AI inference costs plunge 725-fold in 18 months, Epoch AI… →
Newswires Hacker News Mastodon