Commenters blame university fear of federal funding cuts
4 Sep 23 4:50 PM · 4d ago · 7 comments · 1 source · development 4 of 6
Discussion shifts to interpret the question as institutional preemptive compliance driven by threat of federal defunding, with one commenter directly stating the university is 'too cowardly to stand up' to federal pressure.
“It's an indication that your university is too cowardly to stand up to Rumpity and his threats to their finances”
johnduder.bsky.socialdavidho.bsky.social University studentThe student's university Educational institution
The whole story postscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 7 voices · verbatim
-
File a grievance. This question is hostile and inhibits the free expression of ideas on a college campus.
-
I note there isn’t a WTAF option, which there should be
-
No. Always answer no. Bureaucratic forces of ill-willwill react badly to the wrong tick, so give them the right one. Its just your opinion :)
-
Me, speaking with the Staff: Does my paper, "Biodiversity of Honeybees: How Equitable Inclusiveness Propagates the Species Amidst Climate Change Problems" fall under that rubric? I think not, greatest of University sycophants.
-
At the moment when the ruling party is about to get the biggest beatdowns in the history of beatdowns.
-
"could be interpreted as" is an awfully broad parameter. The question itself could be interpreted as those things.
-
Is this from University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa?
All 6 developments of University asks student whether project involves DEI or… →
Bluesky