Mastodon user Bernard reposts the funding-gap argument with added detail
2 Oct 31 8:56 PM · 7d ago · 1 post · 1 source · development 2 of 2
A Mastodon account mirrored the original X post, including an extended version noting the need to fund standing militaries, hardware, ships, submarines, aircraft, tanks, artillery, missiles, drones, and the technological capability to deploy them.
“It’s not just an issue of finding funds for a standing military, hardware, ships, submarines, aircraft, tanks, heavy and light artillery, missiles and drones etc., they also have to fund the technological capabilities to use and deploy modern weapons.”
Bernard, Mastodon user · mastodon ↗@TheLastRefuge2 X account, originator of the post
The whole story posts the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 1 voice · verbatim
-
B
Think about this for a few moments. Canada, the U.K and Europe are all facing the same problem…. MONEY! Where are they going to come up with the funds to pay for a military investment they have declined to make for the past 50+ years? It’s not just an issue of finding funds for a standing military, hardware, ships, submarines, aircraft, tanks…
All 2 developments of Social media post claims Canada, UK and Europe can't fund… →
MastodonX