conv.

All stories
SecurityQuiet 86d · day 87

Schaumburg police share license plate data with 400+ Illinois agencies

A researcher's public records request reveals the scope of automated license plate reader data sharing in one Chicago suburb.

What to know

  • Schaumburg police share automated license plate reader (ALPR) data with over 400 Illinois agencies—including municipal police, sheriffs, universities, railroads, and state offices—creating a seamless surveillance network across the state.
  • The discovery by open-records researcher Jason Hunyar reveals the scale at which license plate tracking data is distributed without individual warrants or public awareness.
  • Critics argue the system enables mapping of citizens' everyday movements and enables potential misuse; some commenters note ALPR cameras also record vehicle make, model, color, bumper stickers, and damage.
  • The finding intensifies ongoing national debate over commercial ALPR platforms like Flock and Vigilant/Motorola, with users calling for stronger oversight and pointing to broader surveillance infrastructure concerns.

The dispute Whether ALPR technology itself is legitimate (with oversight) or constitutes inherent mass surveillance that should be dismantled. · positions read across 91 posts and comments

most voices

This is systemic mass surveillance overreach that constitutes a police state and must be stopped immediately.

  • “Yup, we're now a police state. No more privacy, no more freedoms, no more!”

    growseedsman.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

ALPR technology has legitimate uses for investigations, but this scale of data sharing requires real public oversight and transparency about agency access and use.

  • “License plate readers can be useful for investigations, but the scale of data sharing deserves real public oversight.”

    giankucasmm.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

Individuals should adopt defensive tools and cities should remove Flock cameras; some cities have already done so.

  • “Everyone should add the DeFlock.me app to their phone.”

    chrisbotta.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

The system poses risks of data misuse, criminal access, and data storage serving authoritarian ends; concerns go beyond policing to corporate and state control.

  • “This is the insidious nature of uncontrolled data streams - who has access and what is done with the information? Your employer tracking your off-duty habits? Your health insurance making shadow risk determinations based on lifestyle?”

    svenjohanson.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

Jason Hunyar Open-records researcher, 'Have I Been Flocked?' creatorSchaumburg Police Department Local law enforcement agencyWilliam McGeveran University of Minnesota law professor

The record 2 articles and posts · last 30 days

  1. 'Have I Been Flocked' Researcher Says Over 400 Illinois Agencies Have Surveillance Network Access press · Forbes Business · Mary Whitfill Roeloffs, Forbes Staff · 86d ago
  2. Police in Schaumburg, outside of Chicago, are reportedly sharing license plate reader data with more than 400 agencies. post · Bluesky · forbes.com · 86d ago · 2.6k▲ · 153 comments

What people are saying 24 voices from 1 site · best of 91 · verbatim

Still unanswered
  • What do each of the 400+ agencies do with the ALPR data they access?
  • What controls exist on querying and use of the shared license plate data?
  • Why does Schaumburg share data with non-law-enforcement recipients like universities and private railroads?