AIQuiet 73d · day 75
Indian Copyright Office: AI can produce work, but cannot be its "author"
Office rejects Stephen Thaler's bid to register the AI system DABUS as author of an artwork, while leaving room for AI-generated works to be copyrighted under a human author.
What to know
- India's Copyright Office ruled that an AI system cannot be registered as the legal author of a work, rejecting Stephen Thaler's application for his AI system DABUS.
- The Office indicated AI-generated works can still be eligible for copyright, suggesting authorship must instead be attributed to a human.
- The ruling mirrors similar authorship disputes internationally, including Canada's pending Federal Court case CIPPIC v. Sahni.
Stephen Thaler Creator of AI system DABUSDABUS AI system at the center of the authorship disputeIndian Copyright Office Government body that issued the rulingCIPPIC Party in a related Canadian Federal Court case
The record 8 articles and posts · last 30 days
- summary covers to here · Sep 1, 10:48 AM · 1 piece above arrived after