conv.

All stories
MoreQuiet 14d · day 21

Clancy jurors reveal holdout mimicked strangling with water bottle before mistrial

After a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder case, jurors say the panel was set to acquit by reason of insanity until one holdout blocked the verdict and reenacted the killings.

What to know

  • Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial with the jury split 11-1, after jurors said they had been prepared to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity until one holdout blocked the verdict.
  • Jurors describe the holdout as unwilling to engage with evidence or fellow panelists, and say he later used an exercise band and water bottle to reenact the strangulations during deliberations.
  • Defense attorney Kevin Reddington says he will file a new motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds following the jurors' public accounts.
  • The case remains unresolved as to whether Clancy will face a retrial on the triple murder charges.

“There were three forms I had to fill out and I started filling them out, I wrote my signature on each one but then he said, 'But I'm still not going to say she's not guilty by reason of insanity.'”

Clancy trial juror, juror interviewed with foreperson and two others · NY Post (via NBC 10 Boston) ↗ · Sep 7

Lindsay Clancy Defendant, former nurseKevin Reddington Clancy's defense attorneyJudge William Sullivan Trial judge, Plymouth Superior CourtNick Dargie JurorThe holdout juror Lone dissenting juror (unnamed)

Clancy jurors reveal holdout mimicked strangling with water bottle before mistrial
nypost.com

How it unfolded 5 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesvideos

Peak 3 pieces in 5h at Sep 10, 9 AM; 10 pieces over 21 days (9 articles · 1 video) Sep 3, 5 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Google News 1Sep 3, 10 PM — quietSep 4, 3 AM — quietSep 4, 8 AM — quietSep 4, 1 PM — quietSep 4, 6 PM — 1 piece · 1 video — YouTube 1Sep 4, 11 PM — quietSep 5, 4 AM — quietSep 5, 9 AM — quietSep 5, 2 PM — quietSep 5, 7 PM — quietSep 6, 12 AM — quietSep 6, 5 AM — quietSep 6, 10 AM — quietSep 6, 3 PM — quietSep 6, 8 PM — quietSep 7, 1 AM — quietSep 7, 6 AM — quietSep 7, 11 AM — quietSep 7, 4 PM — quietSep 7, 9 PM — quietSep 8, 2 AM — quietSep 8, 7 AM — quietSep 8, 12 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Sep 8, 5 PM — quietSep 8, 10 PM — quietSep 9, 3 AM — quietSep 9, 8 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Sep 9, 1 PM — quietSep 9, 6 PM — quietSep 9, 11 PM — quietSep 10, 4 AM — quietSep 10, 9 AM — 3 pieces · 3 articles — Newswires 3Sep 10, 2 PM — 3 pieces · 3 articles — Google News 3Sep 10, 7 PM — quietSep 11, 12 AM — quietSep 11, 5 AM — quietSep 11, 10 AM — quietSep 11, 3 PM — quietSep 11, 8 PM — quietSep 12, 1 AM — quietSep 12, 6 AM — quietSep 12, 11 AM — quietSep 12, 4 PM — quietSep 12, 9 PM — quietSep 13, 2 AM — quietSep 13, 7 AM — quietSep 13, 12 PM — quietSep 13, 5 PM — quietSep 13, 10 PM — quietSep 14, 3 AM — quietSep 14, 8 AM — quietSep 14, 1 PM — quietSep 14, 6 PM — quietSep 14, 11 PM — quietSep 15, 4 AM — quietSep 15, 9 AM — quietSep 15, 2 PM — quietSep 15, 7 PM — quietSep 16, 12 AM — quietSep 16, 5 AM — quietSep 16, 10 AM — quietSep 16, 3 PM — quietSep 16, 8 PM — quietSep 17, 1 AM — quietSep 17, 6 AM — quietSep 17, 11 AM — quietSep 17, 4 PM — quietSep 17, 9 PM — quietSep 18, 2 AM — quietSep 18, 7 AM — quietSep 18, 12 PM — quietSep 18, 5 PM — quietSep 18, 10 PM — quietSep 19, 3 AM — quietSep 19, 8 AM — quietSep 19, 1 PM — quietSep 19, 6 PM — quietSep 19, 11 PM — quietSep 20, 4 AM — quietSep 20, 9 AM — quietSep 20, 2 PM — quietSep 20, 7 PM — quietSep 21, 12 AM — quietSep 21, 5 AM — quietSep 21, 10 AM — quietSep 21, 3 PM — quietSep 21, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 1 AM — quietSep 22, 6 AM — quietSep 22, 11 AM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 3 AM — quiet 1234–5
Sep 5Sep 7Sep 9Sep 11Sep 13Sep 15Sep 17Sep 19Sep 21now · 8:50 AM ET
  1. 5

    Jurors say they 'felt defeated' and 'let down Lindsay'

    Additional jurors described feeling the deliberation process had failed, with one telling reporters they felt they had let down Clancy after the panel could not reach a unanimous verdict.

    “We let down Lindsay…”
    — Clancy trial juror, juror · source
    1. first by NBC News, 13d ago

    2. first by WCVB, 13d ago

  2. 4

    Juror says holdout reenacted the strangulations with a water bottle

    Juror Nick Dargie told ABC News the holdout juror pulled an exercise band tied around a water bottle to demonstrate how Clancy killed her children, and could not point to evidence or testimony backing his position.

    “I was just so shocked that he did that.”
    — Nick Dargie
    1. first by RedState, 13d ago · also Fox News

      1 more headline
  3. 3

    Reddington says he'll seek dismissal on double jeopardy grounds

    After jurors began speaking publicly about the deliberations, Clancy's defense attorney Kevin Reddington told CBS Mornings he plans to file a new motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy.

  4. 2

    Jurors reveal panel was ready to acquit before holdout blocked it

    The foreperson and two other jurors told NBC 10 Boston that the panel had prepared not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity forms and signed them before the holdout refused, calling him 'arrogant' and unwilling to engage with the evidence or other jurors.

    “He admitted he had reasonable doubt after we watched the video of the interview.”
    — Clancy trial juror
    1. first by NY Post, 15d ago

  5. 3 days quiet
  6. 1

    Judge Sullivan declares a mistrial after 11-1 deadlock

    After roughly 38 hours of deliberation over seven days and three notes declaring an impasse, Sullivan declared a mistrial with the panel reportedly split 11-1 in favor of acquittal.

    “Jurors were 'robbed' by lone holdout, says Clancy's attorney…”
    — Reuters
  7. background

    Holdout juror note throws deliberations into disarray — The jury foreperson notified Judge William Sullivan that one juror was refusing to follow instructions on reasonable doubt, prompting the judge to question each juror individually under oath and re-read the legal instructions.