Clancy holdout juror changed his mind, complicating appeal strategy
Jury foreperson reveals the sole holdout initially wanted first-degree murder conviction but shifted after reviewing evidence.
What to know
- After a mistrial due to a lone holdout juror, defense attorney Reddington filed a motion for directed acquittal and publicly attacked the juror's credibility.
- Jury foreperson Paula Devlin's new account shows the holdout juror initially wanted first-degree murder but reconsidered after reviewing evidence, contradicting Reddington's narrative.
- The revelation that the juror changed his vote—rather than stubbornly refusing to apply law—significantly weakens Reddington's appeal strategy and any challenge to the mistrial.
Lindsay Clancy DefendantKevin Reddington Defense attorneyPaula Devlin Jury forepersonJudge William Sullivan Trial judge
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articles
-
1
Jury foreperson reveals holdout juror changed vote, undercuts appeal
Jury foreperson Paula Devlin discloses to CBS that the holdout juror initially wanted first-degree murder conviction but shifted his position after reviewing video of Clancy's police interview, suggesting he was a thoughtful deliberator rather than an obstinate holdout. The revelation potentially weakens Reddington's appellate argument.
“the holdout juror refused to vote not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility…because he doubted Clancy was having a psychotic break when she killed her 3 kids…”
— Paula Devlin -
first by TMZ.com, 12d ago
-
-
background
Reddington files motion for directed not guilty verdict — Defense attorney Kevin Reddington files a motion with Judge William Sullivan seeking a directed verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, arguing the state presented insufficient evidence to rebut Clancy's insanity defense.
-
background
Defense attorney Reddington attacks holdout juror in press conference — Following the mistrial, defense attorney Kevin Reddington criticizes the lone holdout, claiming the other jurors 'were robbed by one man' who 'stole seven weeks from the life of these other jurors.'
-
background
Jury deadlocks; mistrial declared after holdout juror refuses to convict — After seven weeks of trial, the jury deadlocks 11-1, with a sole juror refusing to vote guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility. Judge William Sullivan declares a mistrial.
-
background
Lindsay Clancy strangles three children in Duxbury, Massachusetts — Clancy kills her three children—8-month-old Callan, 5-year-old Cora, and 3-year-old Dawson—at her home. The incident does not occur in dispute; Clancy does not deny her involvement.