conv.

All stories
ScienceQuiet 12d · day 13

NASA Saturn hexagon post sparks backlash over AI-generated octagon image

A Bluesky account claiming to share NASA imagery of Saturn's storm is accused of posting AI-generated content with a wrong shape.

What to know

  • A Bluesky account posted an image claimed to show NASA's hexagonal Saturn storm, but commenters immediately identified it as AI-generated, depicting an octagon instead.
  • Multiple technical impossibilities flagged: stars visible inside the storm (physically impossible in a real photograph), shape mismatch with known NASA Cassini data, and no active space probe near Saturn.
  • The account has a documented history of posting misleading AI content falsely attributed to NASA, prompting users to recommend blocking it.
  • The incident highlights growing public concern about AI-generated images eroding trust in visual media and the difficulty of verifying authenticity online.

The dispute A minority of commenters defend the image as real (citing the hexagon shape) or engage in joking/speculative interpretations, but they are heavily outnumbered by users confident the image is AI-generated. · positions read across 84 posts and comments

most voices

The image is AI-generated; Saturn's storm is actually hexagonal, and the image has physical impossibilities like visible stars.

  • “If this were a real photo* the news would have been it shifted from a hexagon to an octagon. This is just AI confusing the two”

    krooshof.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
many voices

The account has a systematic pattern of posting misleading AI content with false NASA attribution and should be blocked.

  • “Not the first time this account has posted BS. I'll block him.”

    fauli.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

AI-generated misinformation is eroding trust and making it hard to know what is real.

  • “AI is making it hard to know what is real...”

    cmm2811.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

redditspaceviewes.bsky.social Bluesky account operatorkrooshof.bsky.social Commenterpsimple.bsky.social Commenter

NASA Saturn hexagon post sparks backlash over AI-generated octagon image
bsky.app

How it unfolded 6 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump postscomments

Peak 25 pieces in 3h at Sep 11, 6 AM; 84 pieces over 13 days (1 post · 83 comments) Sep 11, 3 AM — 21 pieces · 1 post · 20 comments — Bluesky 21Sep 11, 6 AM — 25 pieces · 25 comments — Bluesky 25Sep 11, 9 AM — 19 pieces · 19 comments — Bluesky 19Sep 11, 12 PM — 16 pieces · 16 comments — Bluesky 16Sep 11, 3 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Sep 11, 6 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 11, 9 PM — quietSep 12, 12 AM — quietSep 12, 3 AM — quietSep 12, 6 AM — quietSep 12, 9 AM — quietSep 12, 12 PM — quietSep 12, 3 PM — quietSep 12, 6 PM — quietSep 12, 9 PM — quietSep 13, 12 AM — quietSep 13, 3 AM — quietSep 13, 6 AM — quietSep 13, 9 AM — quietSep 13, 12 PM — quietSep 13, 3 PM — quietSep 13, 6 PM — quietSep 13, 9 PM — quietSep 14, 12 AM — quietSep 14, 3 AM — quietSep 14, 6 AM — quietSep 14, 9 AM — quietSep 14, 12 PM — quietSep 14, 3 PM — quietSep 14, 6 PM — quietSep 14, 9 PM — quietSep 15, 12 AM — quietSep 15, 3 AM — quietSep 15, 6 AM — quietSep 15, 9 AM — quietSep 15, 12 PM — quietSep 15, 3 PM — quietSep 15, 6 PM — quietSep 15, 9 PM — quietSep 16, 12 AM — quietSep 16, 3 AM — quietSep 16, 6 AM — quietSep 16, 9 AM — quietSep 16, 12 PM — quietSep 16, 3 PM — quietSep 16, 6 PM — quietSep 16, 9 PM — quietSep 17, 12 AM — quietSep 17, 3 AM — quietSep 17, 6 AM — quietSep 17, 9 AM — quietSep 17, 12 PM — quietSep 17, 3 PM — quietSep 17, 6 PM — quietSep 17, 9 PM — quietSep 18, 12 AM — quietSep 18, 3 AM — quietSep 18, 6 AM — quietSep 18, 9 AM — quietSep 18, 12 PM — quietSep 18, 3 PM — quietSep 18, 6 PM — quietSep 18, 9 PM — quietSep 19, 12 AM — quietSep 19, 3 AM — quietSep 19, 6 AM — quietSep 19, 9 AM — quietSep 19, 12 PM — quietSep 19, 3 PM — quietSep 19, 6 PM — quietSep 19, 9 PM — quietSep 20, 12 AM — quietSep 20, 3 AM — quietSep 20, 6 AM — quietSep 20, 9 AM — quietSep 20, 12 PM — quietSep 20, 3 PM — quietSep 20, 6 PM — quietSep 20, 9 PM — quietSep 21, 12 AM — quietSep 21, 3 AM — quietSep 21, 6 AM — quietSep 21, 9 AM — quietSep 21, 12 PM — quietSep 21, 3 PM — quietSep 21, 6 PM — quietSep 21, 9 PM — quietSep 22, 12 AM — quietSep 22, 3 AM — quietSep 22, 6 AM — quietSep 22, 9 AM — quietSep 22, 12 PM — quietSep 22, 3 PM — quietSep 22, 6 PM — quietSep 22, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 3 AM — quietYesterday, 6 AM — quietYesterday, 9 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 3 AM — quietToday, 6 AM — quiet 1–6
Sep 12Sep 13Sep 14Sep 15Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22now · 8:50 AM ET
  1. 6

    User questions motivation for posting fake images

    A commenter asks: "Can someone explain to me the motivation and purpose for posting fake images like this? Is there some kind of pay out? I don't understand the purpose…" The thread reveals disagreement on whether the account profits from misleading posts or simply seeks attention.

    “Can someone explain to me the motivation and purpose for posting fake images like this? Is there some kind of pay out?”
    — jdpinc.bsky.social
    • Can someone explain to me the motivation and purpose for posting fake images like this? Is there some kind of pay out? I don’t understand the purpose…

      jdpinc.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago26▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 65 posts in this stretch
    • The posted image seems to have been synthetically generated. Its octagon doesn't match the hexagon NASA published from the Cassini flyby (below):

      photoonist.bsky.socialBluesky12d ago11▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • Tjis picture is AI. The real thing is a hexagon and does not have stars in the center.

      intet.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago10▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. 5

    Users report account history of false posts and recommend blocking

    Multiple commenters, including fauli.bsky.social and psimple.bsky.social, note the account has a pattern of posting misleading AI-generated content, sometimes falsely credited to NASA. Users advise blocking or muting the account.

    “Not the first time this account has posted BS. I'll block him.”
    — fauli.bsky.social
    • Thx. Not the first time this account has posted BS. I'll block him.

      fauli.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago48▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 10 posts in this stretch
    • Insane new image of the unfathomably endless power of Artificial Stupidity. How many cubic meters of clean water did you spoil for getting that shit?

      owenwangensteen.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago8▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • This is probably where the fallen are being held.

      torontafreaky.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago4▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  3. 4

    Broader concern emergesAI making it hard to distinguish real from fake

    A commenter voices a wider worry: "AI is making it hard to know what is real..." The conversation shifts from correcting the specific post to discussing the challenge of verifying images in an age of generative media.

    “AI is making it hard to know what is real...”
    — cmm2811.bsky.social
    • AI is making it hard to know what is real...

      cmm2811.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago15▲view on Bluesky ↗
    1 more of the top 2 · 3 posts in this stretch
    • it's a wormhole. who's going to be the first to fly into it? sounds like a job for Elon Musk

      robinlayfield.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago4▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  4. 3

    Users flag AI generation and physical impossibilities

    Commenter krooshof.bsky.social outlines three technical issues: the shape shifted from hexagon to octagon, stars are visible through the storm's eye (impossible in a real photo), and no advanced space probe is currently near Saturn. Another calls it "AI confusing the two."

    “If this were a real photo* the news would have been it shifted from a hexagon to an octagon. This is just AI confusing the two…”
    — krooshof.bsky.social
    • If this were a real photo* the news would have been it shifted from a hexagon to an octagon. This is just AI confusing the two * The turbulence is not on logical places to form the octagon. * There are stars seen through the eye of the storm * There is no advanced space probe near Saturn right now.

      krooshof.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago34▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 4 posts in this stretch
    • It is hexagonal, even if AI doesn’t know what a hexagon is.

      tgabby68.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago32▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • Nice AI image. Now show us the real one.

      parishchurches.orgBluesky13d ago2▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  5. 2

    Commenters identify shape discrepancy: octagon, not hexagon

    Within 20 minutes, multiple users begin challenging the post's description, noting the shape in the image has eight sides, not six. A user asks "Can you count to 8? It's an octagon; not a hexagon!"

    “Can you count to 8? It's an octagon; not a hexagon!”
    — hagios.bsky.social
    • Can you count to 8? It's an octagon; not a hexagon!

      hagios.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago20▲view on Bluesky ↗
  6. 1

    Bluesky account posts image claimed to be NASA's Saturn hexagon

    The account redditspaceviewes.bsky.social posts an image with the caption "NASA releases insane new image of the mighty hexagonal storm on Saturn's North Pole," describing it as a NASA photograph.

    • redditspaceviewes.bsky.social

      NASA releases insane new image of the mighty hexagonal storm on Saturn's North Pole.

      redditspaceviewes.bsky.socialBluesky13d ago2.6k▲view on Bluesky ↗

What people are saying 12 voices from 1 site · best of 84 · verbatim

Still unanswered
  • What is the account's motivation for posting fake images—profit, attention, or something else?
  • How does Saturn's actual hexagonal storm differ from the AI-generated octagon in the post?