conv.

All stories
ClimateQuiet 8d · day 13

Project Drawdown report rejects regenerative grazing as climate solution

Analysis finds methane and land-use emissions overwhelm soil carbon benefits, despite billions in corporate investment.

newest coverage 8d agosummary written 8d ago3 pieces767 likes & upvotes15 comments BlueskyMastodon

What to know

  • Project Drawdown's analysis argues regenerative grazing is a false climate solution because continuous cattle methane emissions cannot be offset by soil carbon gains, no matter how pastures are managed.
  • The report targets a major corporate and investment movement: major agribusinesses, food companies, and the world's largest meat processor have committed billions to regenerative grazing initiatives.
  • The core conflict is mathematical: offsetting ruminant emissions through soil carbon would require sequestration levels 2–20× the available carbon storage capacity in managed grasslands globally.
  • The analysis recommends dietary change and land restoration rather than grazing method innovation as the path to climate alignment.
most voices

Regenerative grazing cannot achieve climate goals; emissions from cattle methane are insurmountable and soil carbon benefits are overstated.

  • “The idea that 'regenerative' grazing is a climate solution has really taken hold in some quarters. But the science is clear: It doesn't work.”

    globalecoguy.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

“Removing grazing and restoring native ecosystems across global pasture could initially sequester 13.4 Gt CO₂ per year, with that rate declining as ecosystems recover and approach their carbon storage potential.”

Project Drawdown, Climate research organization · Project Drawdown analysis

Project Drawdown Climate research and analysis organizationNicholas D. Carter Author of the analysis

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage posts

Peak 1 piece in 3h at Sep 11, 1 PM; 3 pieces over 13 days (3 posts) Sep 11, 1 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Bluesky 1Sep 11, 4 PM — quietSep 11, 7 PM — quietSep 11, 10 PM — quietSep 12, 1 AM — quietSep 12, 4 AM — quietSep 12, 7 AM — quietSep 12, 10 AM — quietSep 12, 1 PM — quietSep 12, 4 PM — quietSep 12, 7 PM — quietSep 12, 10 PM — quietSep 13, 1 AM — quietSep 13, 4 AM — quietSep 13, 7 AM — quietSep 13, 10 AM — quietSep 13, 1 PM — quietSep 13, 4 PM — quietSep 13, 7 PM — quietSep 13, 10 PM — quietSep 14, 1 AM — quietSep 14, 4 AM — quietSep 14, 7 AM — quietSep 14, 10 AM — quietSep 14, 1 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Sep 14, 4 PM — quietSep 14, 7 PM — quietSep 14, 10 PM — quietSep 15, 1 AM — quietSep 15, 4 AM — quietSep 15, 7 AM — quietSep 15, 10 AM — quietSep 15, 1 PM — quietSep 15, 4 PM — quietSep 15, 7 PM — quietSep 15, 10 PM — quietSep 16, 1 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Bluesky 1Sep 16, 4 AM — quietSep 16, 7 AM — quietSep 16, 10 AM — quietSep 16, 1 PM — quietSep 16, 4 PM — quietSep 16, 7 PM — quietSep 16, 10 PM — quietSep 17, 1 AM — quietSep 17, 4 AM — quietSep 17, 7 AM — quietSep 17, 10 AM — quietSep 17, 1 PM — quietSep 17, 4 PM — quietSep 17, 7 PM — quietSep 17, 10 PM — quietSep 18, 1 AM — quietSep 18, 4 AM — quietSep 18, 7 AM — quietSep 18, 10 AM — quietSep 18, 1 PM — quietSep 18, 4 PM — quietSep 18, 7 PM — quietSep 18, 10 PM — quietSep 19, 1 AM — quietSep 19, 4 AM — quietSep 19, 7 AM — quietSep 19, 10 AM — quietSep 19, 1 PM — quietSep 19, 4 PM — quietSep 19, 7 PM — quietSep 19, 10 PM — quietSep 20, 1 AM — quietSep 20, 4 AM — quietSep 20, 7 AM — quietSep 20, 10 AM — quietSep 20, 1 PM — quietSep 20, 4 PM — quietSep 20, 7 PM — quietSep 20, 10 PM — quietSep 21, 1 AM — quietSep 21, 4 AM — quietSep 21, 7 AM — quietSep 21, 10 AM — quietSep 21, 1 PM — quietSep 21, 4 PM — quietSep 21, 7 PM — quietSep 21, 10 PM — quietSep 22, 1 AM — quietSep 22, 4 AM — quietSep 22, 7 AM — quietSep 22, 10 AM — quietSep 22, 1 PM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 7 PM — quietSep 22, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 1 AM — quiet 1
Sep 12Sep 13Sep 14Sep 15Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22now · 4:43 AM ET
  1. 1

    Report circulates to decentralized social platforms

    The Drawdown analysis reached federated platforms including Mastodon, where users shared and discussed the findings on climate and agriculture.

    “The idea that 'regenerative' grazing is a climate solution has really taken hold in some quarters. But the science is clear: It doesn't work.”
    — globalecoguy.bsky.social, Social media commenter · source
    • georgemonbiot.bsky.social

      "Regenerative grazing" is a greenwashing scam, nothing more. Here's why. Please don't be taken in.

      georgemonbiot.bsky.socialBluesky8d ago574▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 3 posts in this stretch

    • Eight reasons regenerative grazing can’t make beef climate-friendly | Project Drawdown

      cm0002@libretechni.caMastodon9d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
    • globalecoguy.bsky.social

      The idea that "regenerative" grazing is a climate solution has really taken hold in some quarters. But the science is clear: It doesn't work. Methane and land-use emissions just overwhelm any soil carbon benefits. Here's a great piece by @nicholasdcarter.bsky.social

      globalecoguy.bsky.socialBluesky12d ago192▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. background

    Project Drawdown publishes analysis rejecting regenerative grazing as climate fix — Project Drawdown released a detailed analysis by Nicholas D. Carter arguing that regenerative grazing cannot deliver climate-friendly beef. The report identifies eight reasons why the practice fails: methane emissions continue regardless of soil management, soil carbon sequestration cannot offset livestock emissions at scale, and the land-use math overwhelmingly favors ecosystem restoration over continued cattle production.

What people are saying 0 voices from 0 sites · best of 3 · verbatim