conv.

All stories
AIQuiet 14d · day 14

AI models trained in biology may need safeguards against bioweapon creation

Current chatbots pose limited risk, but next-generation AI raises concerns about lone-actor pathogen development.

newest coverage 13d agosummary written 13d ago7 pieces6 likes & upvotes MastodonNewswiresBluesky

What to know

  • Current AI chatbots pose limited risk for bioweapon creation by individuals, according to experts quoted in the analysis.
  • Future AI models specifically trained on biological data may require additional safety measures to prevent misuse.
  • The article highlights an emerging gap between current AI capabilities and potential risks as the technology advances.

“Current chatbots aren't likely to help lone actors invent a deadly pathogen, experts say. But newer models, trained in biology, may need stronger safeguards.”

Carl Zimmer, New York Times science reporter · New York Times ↗ · Sep 13

Carl ZimmerCarl Zimmer New York Times science reporter

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts

Peak 7 pieces in 4h at Sep 14, 4 AM; 7 pieces over 14 days (5 articles · 2 posts) Sep 14, 4 AM — 7 pieces · 5 articles · 2 posts — Newswires 4, Mastodon 2, Bluesky 1Sep 14, 8 AM — quietSep 14, 12 PM — quietSep 14, 4 PM — quietSep 14, 8 PM — quietSep 15, 12 AM — quietSep 15, 4 AM — quietSep 15, 8 AM — quietSep 15, 12 PM — quietSep 15, 4 PM — quietSep 15, 8 PM — quietSep 16, 12 AM — quietSep 16, 4 AM — quietSep 16, 8 AM — quietSep 16, 12 PM — quietSep 16, 4 PM — quietSep 16, 8 PM — quietSep 17, 12 AM — quietSep 17, 4 AM — quietSep 17, 8 AM — quietSep 17, 12 PM — quietSep 17, 4 PM — quietSep 17, 8 PM — quietSep 18, 12 AM — quietSep 18, 4 AM — quietSep 18, 8 AM — quietSep 18, 12 PM — quietSep 18, 4 PM — quietSep 18, 8 PM — quietSep 19, 12 AM — quietSep 19, 4 AM — quietSep 19, 8 AM — quietSep 19, 12 PM — quietSep 19, 4 PM — quietSep 19, 8 PM — quietSep 20, 12 AM — quietSep 20, 4 AM — quietSep 20, 8 AM — quietSep 20, 12 PM — quietSep 20, 4 PM — quietSep 20, 8 PM — quietSep 21, 12 AM — quietSep 21, 4 AM — quietSep 21, 8 AM — quietSep 21, 12 PM — quietSep 21, 4 PM — quietSep 21, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 12 AM — quietSep 22, 4 AM — quietSep 22, 8 AM — quietSep 22, 12 PM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 23, 12 AM — quietSep 23, 4 AM — quietSep 23, 8 AM — quietSep 23, 12 PM — quietSep 23, 4 PM — quietSep 23, 8 PM — quietSep 24, 12 AM — quietSep 24, 4 AM — quietSep 24, 8 AM — quietSep 24, 12 PM — quietSep 24, 4 PM — quietSep 24, 8 PM — quietSep 25, 12 AM — quietSep 25, 4 AM — quietSep 25, 8 AM — quietSep 25, 12 PM — quietSep 25, 4 PM — quietSep 25, 8 PM — quietSep 26, 12 AM — quietSep 26, 4 AM — quietSep 26, 8 AM — quietSep 26, 12 PM — quietSep 26, 4 PM — quietSep 26, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quiet 1
Sep 15Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24Sep 25Sep 26now · 1:50 AM ET
  1. 1

    Carl Zimmer reports on AI and bioweapon risk

    The New York Times publishes an analysis of whether AI is raising the chances of biological warfare. The article notes that current chatbots are unlikely to help lone actors invent deadly pathogens, but warns that newer models trained in biology may need stronger safeguards.

    1. 3 outlets Is A.I. Raising the Chances of Biological Warfare?

      first by Mastodon, 13d ago · also NYT, NYT Science