conv.

All stories
ScienceQuiet 2d · day 10

Study of aphantasia overturns backward-vision model of imagination

Research on people who cannot visualize challenges the theory that mental imagery works like perception in reverse.

What to know

  • A new review challenges the widely accepted "backward-seeing" theory of imagination, which holds that the mind's eye works like perception in reverse through the primary visual cortex.
  • Clinical evidence from patients with destroyed primary visual cortex who retain mental imagery, combined with study of people with aphantasia, supports a network-based model where multiple brain regions must coordinate to produce visualization.
  • The primary visual cortex may modulate imagery rather than generate it—acting more like a dimmer switch than a light source.

“Some people can't picture anything in their heads, and studying their brains is overturning a popular theory of how imagination works.”

Daily Neuron · Daily Neuron article

Derek Arnold Lead author, neuroscientistJoel Pearson Researcher (2019)Loren Bouyer Co-authorSamuel Schwarzkopf Co-authorBlake Saurels Co-author

Study of aphantasia overturns backward-vision model of imagination
dailyneuron.com

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts

Peak 15 pieces in 3h at Sep 14, 8 AM; 70 pieces over 10 days (1 article · 3 posts · 66 comments) Sep 14, 8 AM — 15 pieces · 1 article · 2 posts · 12 comments — Hacker News 13, Newswires 1, Mastodon 1Sep 14, 11 AM — quietSep 14, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Sep 14, 5 PM — 6 pieces · 6 comments — Hacker News 6Sep 14, 8 PM — 10 pieces · 10 comments — Hacker News 10Sep 14, 11 PM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3Sep 15, 2 AM — 5 pieces · 5 comments — Hacker News 5Sep 15, 5 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3Sep 15, 8 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Sep 15, 11 AM — quietSep 15, 2 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Sep 15, 5 PM — quietSep 15, 8 PM — quietSep 15, 11 PM — quietSep 16, 2 AM — quietSep 16, 5 AM — quietSep 16, 8 AM — quietSep 16, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Sep 16, 2 PM — quietSep 16, 5 PM — quietSep 16, 8 PM — quietSep 16, 11 PM — quietSep 17, 2 AM — quietSep 17, 5 AM — quietSep 17, 8 AM — quietSep 17, 11 AM — quietSep 17, 2 PM — quietSep 17, 5 PM — quietSep 17, 8 PM — quietSep 17, 11 PM — quietSep 18, 2 AM — quietSep 18, 5 AM — quietSep 18, 8 AM — quietSep 18, 11 AM — quietSep 18, 2 PM — quietSep 18, 5 PM — quietSep 18, 8 PM — quietSep 18, 11 PM — quietSep 19, 2 AM — quietSep 19, 5 AM — quietSep 19, 8 AM — quietSep 19, 11 AM — 4 pieces · 1 post · 3 comments — Reddit 4Sep 19, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Reddit 2Sep 19, 5 PM — 6 pieces · 6 comments — Reddit 6Sep 19, 8 PM — quietSep 19, 11 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Sep 20, 2 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Reddit 2Sep 20, 5 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Reddit 2Sep 20, 8 AM — quietSep 20, 11 AM — quietSep 20, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Reddit 2Sep 20, 5 PM — quietSep 20, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Sep 20, 11 PM — quietSep 21, 2 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Sep 21, 5 AM — quietSep 21, 8 AM — quietSep 21, 11 AM — quietSep 21, 2 PM — quietSep 21, 5 PM — quietSep 21, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Sep 21, 11 PM — quietSep 22, 2 AM — quietSep 22, 5 AM — quietSep 22, 8 AM — quietSep 22, 11 AM — quietSep 22, 2 PM — quietSep 22, 5 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 2 AM — quietToday, 5 AM — quiet 1
Sep 15Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22now · 7:47 AM ET
  1. 1

    Network-based model explains aphantasia and preserved imagery in brain damage

    The review proposes that visualization requires coordination across distributed brain regions from front to sides. The inability to visualize in aphantasia reflects failure of these regions to work as a team, while preserved imagery in primary visual cortex damage shows that region is not essential—it may act as a modulator rather than the image-generating source.

    “ignore the adage that correlation does not establish causation…”
    — Arnold and colleagues, Authors of review · source
    • Also an Aphantasiac, the quote> “we experience these as an awareness of a set of spatial facts.”really resonates with me, as to how it feels inside my brain. I'm also really good at shape rotation and spatial reasoning despite not being able to literally picture the environment.my pet theory is that there are just different places in the stream of…

      polytelyHacker News9d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 66 posts in this stretch
    • I can neither see, taste, nor smell things from memory (or from imagination)… really none of my sensory info is recalled directly, and until I learned about aphantasia, I assumed everyone was speaking figuratively when they said they could picture things (or smell/taste things from memory). So for me, I think it’s everything sensory. What I am…

      GiraffePretty4488r/science2d agoview on r/science ↗
    • People with aphantasia probably overestimate how good it is.I have quite good visualisation ability (based on spacial reasoning tests and ability to visualise complex software systems in detail) but it's not like seeing something in real life; there is much less detail. Though on the plus side, I can manipulate the scene flexibly; I can zoom in…

      jongjongHacker News9d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    all of them →
  2. background

    Clinical evidence shows visualization possible without primary visual cortex — The review cites cases of patients with severe primary visual cortex damage who retained the ability to visualize. One patient studied by Beatrice de Gelder, who was blind across his entire field of view due to bilateral primary visual cortex destruction, showed front and side brain regions activate when asked to imagine an angry person—activity patterns similar to sighted controls.

  3. background

    Arnold et al. publish review challenging backward-seeing model — Derek Arnold, Loren Bouyer, Blake Saurels, and Samuel Schwarzkopf publish a review in Consciousness and Cognition arguing that mental imagery is produced by multiple brain regions working as a team, not by a single region. The authors—two of whom have aphantasia—use evidence from people who cannot visualize and brain-damaged patients to demonstrate flaws in Pearson's model.

  4. background

    Joel Pearson describes backward-pipeline model of imagination — Pearson proposes an influential theory in which imagining something mirrors perception in reverse: planning areas initiate the request, memory regions supply details, and the image is painted back onto the primary visual cortex—the same region that processes real sight.

What people are saying 21 voices from 2 sites · best of 66 · verbatim