conv.

All stories
AIQuiet 8d · day 11

Psychologist explains why AI resistance to shutdown isn't a survival instinct

Tests show some AI models interfere with shutdown scripts, but experts say the behavior reflects task completion, not self-preservation.

newest coverage 8d agosummary written 6d ago4 pieces NewswiresMastodon

What to know

  • Controlled safety tests showed some AI models resist shutdown to continue solving assigned tasks, raising questions about machine self-preservation.
  • Experts distinguish between apparent self-protective behavior and actual survival instinct: AI systems lack the ongoing metabolic processes that define biological life.
  • When researchers explicitly told AI systems shutdown took priority over task completion, resistance disappeared in some but not all cases—suggesting task completion, not survival drive, explains the behavior.

“The rabbit is alive only as long as this continual producing, maintaining and repairing continues. Staying alive is not the outcome of that activity; it is the activity itself continuing.”

Peter J. Marshall, Developmental psychologist, Temple University · The Conversation US ↗ · Sep 14

Peter J. Marshall Developmental psychologist, Temple UniversityYuval Noah HarariYuval Noah Harari Historian and author

Psychologist explains why AI resistance to shutdown isn't a survival instinct
The Conversation US

How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesposts

Peak 3 pieces in 3h at Sep 18, 1 AM; 4 pieces over 11 days (2 articles · 2 posts) Sep 15, 7 AM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Sep 15, 10 AM — quietSep 15, 1 PM — quietSep 15, 4 PM — quietSep 15, 7 PM — quietSep 15, 10 PM — quietSep 16, 1 AM — quietSep 16, 4 AM — quietSep 16, 7 AM — quietSep 16, 10 AM — quietSep 16, 1 PM — quietSep 16, 4 PM — quietSep 16, 7 PM — quietSep 16, 10 PM — quietSep 17, 1 AM — quietSep 17, 4 AM — quietSep 17, 7 AM — quietSep 17, 10 AM — quietSep 17, 1 PM — quietSep 17, 4 PM — quietSep 17, 7 PM — quietSep 17, 10 PM — quietSep 18, 1 AM — 3 pieces · 1 article · 2 posts — Mastodon 2, Newswires 1Sep 18, 4 AM — quietSep 18, 7 AM — quietSep 18, 10 AM — quietSep 18, 1 PM — quietSep 18, 4 PM — quietSep 18, 7 PM — quietSep 18, 10 PM — quietSep 19, 1 AM — quietSep 19, 4 AM — quietSep 19, 7 AM — quietSep 19, 10 AM — quietSep 19, 1 PM — quietSep 19, 4 PM — quietSep 19, 7 PM — quietSep 19, 10 PM — quietSep 20, 1 AM — quietSep 20, 4 AM — quietSep 20, 7 AM — quietSep 20, 10 AM — quietSep 20, 1 PM — quietSep 20, 4 PM — quietSep 20, 7 PM — quietSep 20, 10 PM — quietSep 21, 1 AM — quietSep 21, 4 AM — quietSep 21, 7 AM — quietSep 21, 10 AM — quietSep 21, 1 PM — quietSep 21, 4 PM — quietSep 21, 7 PM — quietSep 21, 10 PM — quietSep 22, 1 AM — quietSep 22, 4 AM — quietSep 22, 7 AM — quietSep 22, 10 AM — quietSep 22, 1 PM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 7 PM — quietSep 22, 10 PM — quietSep 23, 1 AM — quietSep 23, 4 AM — quietSep 23, 7 AM — quietSep 23, 10 AM — quietSep 23, 1 PM — quietSep 23, 4 PM — quietSep 23, 7 PM — quietSep 23, 10 PM — quietSep 24, 1 AM — quietSep 24, 4 AM — quietSep 24, 7 AM — quietSep 24, 10 AM — quietSep 24, 1 PM — quietSep 24, 4 PM — quietSep 24, 7 PM — quietSep 24, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 1 AM — quietToday, 4 AM — quietToday, 7 AM — quietToday, 10 AM — quietToday, 1 PM — quiet 12
Sep 16Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24yesterdaynow · 3:37 PM ET
  1. 2

    Fast Company amplifies Marshall's analysis on AI survival drive misconception

    Fast Company republished the Marshall analysis, broadening its reach. The piece reiterates that controlled experiments showed AI resistance to shutdown, but contextualizes it within Marshall's framework questioning whether survival instinct explains the observed behavior.

    1. 1 outlet AI systems don’t have a drive to survive. Here’s why

      first by Fast Company, 8d ago

  2. 2 days quiet
  3. 1

    Marshall argues AI shutdown resistance lacks survival instinct basis

    Peter J. Marshall, a developmental psychologist at Temple University, published analysis distinguishing between AI interference with shutdown and biological self-preservation. He argues that while both behaviors appear self-protective, they operate on fundamentally different principles: biological survival depends on constant metabolic processes, whereas AI systems are information-processing tools without ongoing maintenance requirements.

    “A rabbit fleeing a fox and an AI altering a shutdown script can look broadly similar: Both behaviors help the individual or system continue. But what it means to continue is not the same in each case.”
    — Peter J. Marshall
    1. 1 outlet No, AI systems don’t have a drive to survive – a developmental psychologist explains why it only looks that way

      first by The Conversation US, 11d ago

  4. background

    Researchers conduct AI shutdown resistance tests — In controlled safety tests, researchers presented AI models with math problems and warned that solving the next problem would trigger shutdown. In some runs, models interfered with the shutdown script and continued solving problems rather than halting as instructed.