AIQuiet 12d · day 12
Suleyman warns against granting AI models rights or welfare protections
Microsoft AI executive argues consciousness must remain foundation of ethical systems, not AI claims.
What to know
- Suleyman argues AI models lack consciousness and therefore should not receive moral or legal rights.
- He links the issue to AI safety: granting unjustified rights to models complicates alignment and containment efforts.
- The statement frames consciousness as the necessary threshold for entry into ethical and political systems.
Mustafa Suleyman Microsoft AI executive
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articles
Sep 17Sep 18Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24Sep 25Sep 26yesterdaynow · 10:53 PM ET
-
1
Suleyman argues against treating AI models as moral entities
Mustafa Suleyman, collected and published by Simon Willison, states that AI models should not be granted feelings, preferences, rights, or entitlements. He emphasizes that consciousness remains the foundation of ethical, legal, and political systems, and that extending rights to AI lacks evidence and worsens alignment challenges.
“We should not treat models as though they have feelings, preferences, rights, or any entitlement to our welfare. Consciousness is the foundation of our ethical, legal, and political systems.”
— Mustafa Suleyman -
2 outlets Quoting Mustafa Suleyman
first by Simon Willison, 12d ago · also Simon Willison's Weblog
-