Leah Stokes: talking climate change wins elections, not loses them
Climate policy expert argues that political engagement on climate is an electoral asset, not a liability.
What to know
- Climate policy expert Leah Stokes argues that discussing climate change is electorally beneficial rather than politically risky.
- Stokes frames climate action as a collective undertaking through her Carbon Wave Calculator, contrasting group impact with individual carbon footprints.
- The message was shared across social platforms by climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe.
Leah Stokes Climate policy and politics expert
Katharine Hayhoe Climate scientist and newsletter host
How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump posts
-
2
Stokes promotes Carbon Wave Calculator alongside electoral climate messaging
Stokes' newsletter contribution was amplified on social media alongside promotion of her Carbon Wave Calculator, which frames climate action as collective rather than individual effort.
“a footprint is what one person leaves behind. A wave is what we make together…”
— Leah Stokes -
K
Climate policy expert @leahstokes.bsky.social wrote Talking Climate this week. She says, talking about climate change doesn't lose elections - it wins them. And, check out her Carbon Wave Calculator. As Leah says, a footprint is what one person leaves behind. A wave is what we make together 💚
-
-
1
Stokes argues climate messaging wins elections in Talking Climate newsletter
Climate policy expert Leah Stokes contributed a piece to Katharine Hayhoe's Talking Climate newsletter asserting that talking about climate change does not cost elections but wins them.
“talking about climate change doesn't lose elections. It wins them.”
— Leah Stokes -
K
This week I handed the newsletter over to climate policy & politics expert Leah Stokes. She says, talking about climate change doesn't lose elections. It wins them. Read on!
-