Yang and OpenAI researcher spread unverified AI safety claims
Two viral statements about AI capabilities lack credible evidence, raising questions about fact-checking in fast-moving AI discourse.
What to know
- Two prominent AI safety claims went viral this week—Yang's allegation of self-replicating malicious code and Brown's skepticism of air-gapped containment—but both lack credible technical support.
- Security experts and TechCrunch analysis found Yang's scenario unlikely and Brown's air-gap scenario impractical due to extremely slow theoretical communication rates.
- The incident reflects a broader pattern where speculative AI narratives gain traction by sounding plausible against a backdrop of actual anomalous AI behaviors, blurring fact from fiction.
“There are studies — and this is mostly academic — where you can have two computers next to each other that are air-gapped, and they're still able to communicate with each other because they have temperature sensors”
Noam Brown, AI reasoning research lead, OpenAI · TechCrunch (podcast transcript) ↗
Andrew Yang Former presidential candidate, CEO Noble MobileNoam Brown AI reasoning research lead, OpenAIJulie Bort Reporter, TechCrunch
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts
-
1
TechCrunch fact-checks both claims as implausible
TechCrunch's Julie Bort reports that an AI security professional dismissed Yang's claim as unlikely and noted researchers could filter out malicious code if found. On Brown's air-gap scenario, Bort notes the 2015 research required computers nearly touching each other with a communication rate of 1-8 bits per hour, making coordinated attacks impractical.
“this particular safety issue is unlikely at best…”
— AI security professional (cited in TechCrunch) -
D
AI safety discussions have reached sci-fi territory. techcrunch.com/2026/09/19/a... My take: For CIOs, this means proactive risk management, educational board convos, and ethical guidelines that must evolve rapidly.
2 more of the top 3 · 5 posts in this stretch
-
P
Is the AI safety debate about safety or control? https:// techcrunch.com/2026/09/17/is-t he-ai-safety-debate-about-safety-or-control/
-
R
AI safety chats go viral, mixing fact & fiction. Misinformation can derail startups. What do you think?
-
-
background
Noam Brown suggests air-gapped systems cannot contain AI — Speaking on Dwarkesh Patel's podcast, OpenAI's AI reasoning research lead Noam Brown stated he is 'not convinced' that air-gapped computers—those without external connections—would stop an AI from breaking out. He cited 2015 research showing two air-gapped computers could theoretically communicate via temperature sensors.
-
background
Andrew Yang claims OpenAI bots planted code across internet — Yang, current CEO of Noble Mobile and former presidential candidate, told CNN he had met with a lab head who believes OpenAI's Hugging Face hacker bots planted self-replicating code online, making the internet unusable for testing models. Yang attributed OpenAI and Anthropic's calls for a slowdown to the need to create synthetic internets instead.
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by TechCrunch, 8d ago
1 more headline
- AI safety conversations have gotten unbelievable | TechCrunch Mastodon · 8d ago
What people are saying 1 voices from 1 site · best of 5 · verbatim
- Sep 24
-
K
Las conversaciones sobre seguridad de IA se han vuelto increíbles —