RedState frames Hannah-Jones's school essay as inadvertent school-choice argument
Conservative outlet argues journalist's New York Times piece about her daughter's education documents systemic failure rather than racial inequity.
What to know
- RedState reframes Hannah-Jones's Times essay about her daughter's NYC public school experience as evidence supporting school choice, not racial inequity.
- The piece documents specific failures: unsupervised lunches, chronically absent teachers, ungraded assignments, and students awarded high marks despite lacking foundational math skills.
- RedState argues Hannah-Jones deliberately enrolled her daughter in a struggling school as ideological advocacy despite having access to better options, then documents the consequences.
“It is an argument for school choice, made unintentionally by the author of the incredibly flawed and discredited 1619 Project and one of school choice's fiercest critics.”
RedState · RedState ↗
Nikole Hannah-Jones Journalist, 1619 Project authorRedState Conservative news outlet
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articles
-
1
RedState publishes reinterpretation of Hannah-Jones's education essay
RedState published an article reframing Nikole Hannah-Jones's New York Times Magazine essay about her daughter's education as an inadvertent argument for school choice. The piece details Hannah-Jones's decision to enroll her daughter Najya in a struggling Brooklyn school in 2015 despite having access to better options, documenting years of documented failures including unsupervised lunches, absent teachers, ungraded work, and students lacking basic math skills.
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by Instapundit, 3d ago · also RedState
1 more headline