AIQuiet 6d · day 6
Researcher reports Anthropic's Fable 5 performs worse after subscription rollout
User measurements show the model delivered significantly fewer thinking tokens in August after permanent availability on paid plans.
What to know
- A researcher publicly reported that Anthropic's Fable 5 model performs noticeably worse after being made permanently available in subscription plans.
- The performance decline was measured across five different methods, with August showing significantly fewer thinking tokens than July.
- The observation raises questions about whether model degradation is intentional, accidental, or related to operational changes following the subscription rollout.
Lon Lundgren Researcher / Model UserAnthropic AI Company
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage posts
Sep 21Sep 22Sep 23Sep 24yesterdaynow · 11:46 AM ET
-
1
Lundgren measures sharp performance decline in Fable 5 after subscription launch
Lon Lundgren posted observations that after Anthropic made Fable 5 permanently available in subscription plans, the model's performance degraded noticeably. Measuring five different ways, he found August delivered dramatically fewer thinking tokens than July.
“After Anthropic made Fable 5 permanently available in subscription plans, I noticed a large drop in performance. The model felt dumber, and I couldn't explain why.”
— Lon Lundgren -
1 outlet Lon Lundgren (@Lon) on X
first by Mastodon, 5d ago
-
After Anthropic made Fable 5 permanently available in subscription plans, I noticed a large drop in performance. The model felt dumber, and I couldn't explain why. Measured five different ways, August delivered dramatically fewer thinking tokens than July.
-