conv.

All stories
HealthQuiet · 34h

Bristol study: FIFA World Cup 26 saturated with 9 ads per minute of harmful brands

Researchers found unhealthy food, alcohol, and gambling brands dominated sponsorships, generating 267 billion UK impressions across inescapable pitch-side advertising.

What to know

  • Unhealthy food and drink brands dominated FIFA World Cup 26 sponsorship at 70.4% of all detected branding, with harmful product advertising visible for nearly a quarter of all live play and impossible for viewers to avoid.
  • Four global brands—a soft drink, fast-food chain, sports drink, and crisps brand—accounted for 65% of all harmful logos, exposing UK audiences alone to 267 billion impressions across 53 broadcasts.
  • FIFA distributed identical embedded advertising worldwide despite existing technology to customize ads by country, potentially violating advertising restrictions in nations where alcohol, gambling, or prediction markets are banned or limited.

Dr Raffaello Rossi Senior Lecturer in Marketing, University of BristolDr Elisa Becker Researcher, University of OxfordUniversity of Bristol and University of Oxford Research institutions

Bristol study: FIFA World Cup 26 saturated with 9 ads per minute of harmful brands
bristol.ac.uk

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts

Peak 9 pieces in one hour at Sep 22, 7 AM; 24 pieces over 42 hours (1 article · 4 posts · 19 comments) Sep 22, 6 AM — 5 pieces · 1 article · 3 posts · 1 comment — Mastodon 2, Hacker News 2, Newswires 1Sep 22, 7 AM — 9 pieces · 9 comments — Hacker News 9Sep 22, 8 AM — 2 pieces · 1 post · 1 comment — Hacker News 1, Mastodon 1Sep 22, 9 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Hacker News 3Sep 22, 10 AM — quietSep 22, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Hacker News 1Sep 22, 12 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Sep 22, 1 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Hacker News 2Sep 22, 2 PM — quietSep 22, 3 PM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 5 PM — quietSep 22, 6 PM — quietSep 22, 7 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 9 PM — quietSep 22, 10 PM — quietSep 22, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 3 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 6 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 9 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quiet 1
8 AM4 PMyesterday8 AM4 PMnow · 12:06 AM ET
  1. background

    Study reveals FIFA distributed identical advertising globally despite technology to customize by country — Researchers highlight that FIFA's match footage with the same embedded advertising was shared with broadcasters worldwide, including countries where alcohol, gambling, or prediction market advertising may be restricted or illegal. Despite existing virtual board replacement technology that enables different advertising in different countries, FIFA did not customize the content.

  2. background

    Study finds unhealthy food brands dominate tournament sponsorship at 70.4% of all branding — The analysis counted advertising built into match footage on hoardings rather than commercial breaks. Harmful branding appeared in every match and was visible during 39.3 hours of live play—almost a quarter of all action. Unhealthy food and drink brands dominated at 70.4%, followed by prediction markets (9,360 appearances), alcohol (9,266), gambling (6,429), and cryptocurrency (2,632). Four brands—a soft drink brand (21,893 logos), fast-food chain (13,915), sports drink (12,777), and crisps brand (12,087)—accounted for 65% of all harmful logos.

  3. 1

    Bristol and Oxford researchers publish analysis of harmful branding across FIFA World Cup 26

    The University of Bristol and University of Oxford released findings from the first study to examine harmful commodity branding across an entire FIFA World Cup. Using the UK's Isambard-AI supercomputer, the team analyzed all 172.6 hours of live play across 104 matches. Nearly six billion people globally engaged with the tournament, and researchers estimated harmful product advertising generated 267 billion impressions across 53 UK broadcasts.

    “As one of the world's most watched sporting events, reaching billions of people, this year's FIFA World Cup provided an unparalleled platform for advertising.”
    — Dr Raffaello Rossi
    • Most comments may have ignored this so far, but this is an interesting AI based research.At the end of the article is this excerpt>> Results from this research were generated using an AI computer vision model developed by the research team on Bristol’s Isambard-AI, the UK’s most powerful AI supercomputer. Isambard-AI powered the analysis of 172.6…

      gps372Hacker News1d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 6 posts in this stretch
    • I'm actually surprised it's only that many ads? How can people even take a screenshot of the screen without a bunch of ads on it? You can't even take a look at a player, their jersey has basically ads on it, the ball, the shoes, the names of stadiums... Or do they not count the adidas/nike/reebok logos?

      serial_devHacker News1d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    • It's not only the World Cup, it's everything, everywhere, all the time. We are drowning in marketing messages. It's gross.

      wateralienHacker News1d agoview on Hacker News ↗
    all of them →

What people are saying 16 voices from 1 site · best of 19 · verbatim