conv.

All stories
BusinessActive · 42h

Study: High-mileage used EVs fail MOTs less often than petrol cars

Analysis of 47.4m MOT tests finds electric cars with 90,000+ miles are markedly more likely to pass than petrol equivalents.

What to know

  • EVs with 90,000-120,000 miles were about 25% less likely to fail MOTs than petrol cars of the same age (16.5% vs 22.1% failure rate).
  • Beyond 120,000 miles, the gap persisted: 16% EV failure rate versus 23.5% for petrol.
  • MOT tests don't measure battery health or degradation, so buyers still need to check that separately alongside roadworthiness.
  • EVs showed weaknesses too — nearly double the tyre defects of petrol cars, and more brake corrosion issues on older, low-mileage EVs.

“That matters because the used market is where the transition to electric becomes accessible to millions more motorists. Giving buyers confidence in these cars will be critical to creating a healthy and affordable secondhand EV market.”

Toby Poston, BVRLA chief executive · Guardian ↗ · Sep 21

Toby Poston BVRLA chief executiveBen Nelmes Chief executive, New AutoMotiveNew AutoMotive Consultancy that conducted the researchBritish Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (BVRLA) Industry group that commissioned the study

Study: High-mileage used EVs fail MOTs less often than petrol cars
theguardian.com

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts

Peak 8 pieces in one hour at Sep 22, 8 AM; 31 pieces over 43 hours (11 articles · 12 posts · 8 comments) Sep 22, 7 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Sep 22, 8 AM — 8 pieces · 7 articles · 1 post — Google News 3, Newswires 3, Mastodon 2Sep 22, 9 AM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — Mastodon 1, Reddit 1Sep 22, 10 AM — quietSep 22, 11 AM — 3 pieces · 1 post · 2 comments — Reddit 2, Mastodon 1Sep 22, 12 PM — 2 pieces · 2 articles — Google News 2Sep 22, 1 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Hacker News 1Sep 22, 2 PM — quietSep 22, 3 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Reddit 1Sep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 5 PM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Reddit 4Sep 22, 6 PM — 2 pieces · 2 articles — Google News 2Sep 22, 7 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 9 PM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — Mastodon 2Sep 22, 10 PM — quietSep 22, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Yesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 3 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Yesterday, 6 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Yesterday, 7 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Yesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 9 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Reddit 1Yesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 1 AM — quiet 1
8 AM4 PMyesterday8 AM4 PMnow · 2:58 AM ET
  1. 1

    New AutoMotive study finds high-mileage EVs outperform petrol cars in MOTs

    Analysis of 47.4m MOT tests found EVs with 90,000-120,000 miles had a 16.5% failure rate versus 22.1% for petrol cars of the same age; beyond 120,000 miles, 16% of EVs failed compared with 23.5% of petrol cars. The study, commissioned by the BVRLA, also found EVs had nearly twice as many tyre defects and older, low-mileage EVs showed more friction-brake defects linked to corrosion from underuse.

    “What we can now challenge is the idea that an electric car with 80,000 or 100,000 miles on the clock should automatically be regarded as worn out.”
    — Toby Poston
    1. first by The Telegraph, 1d ago · also Guardian, Guardian Environment

      1 more headline
    2. first by The Independent, 1d ago · also CarsGuide

      1 more headline
    2 more claims →
    • cdarwin@c.im

      Motorists buying a secondhand car with a lot of miles on the clock are likely to find an electric vehicle (EV) ultimately more reliable than a petrol vehicle, according to a study. An analysis of 47.4m MOT tests found that after cars were driven 90,000 to 120,000 miles, EVs were about 25% less likely to fail than petrol models of the same age…

      cdarwin@c.imMastodon1d ago25▲view on Mastodon ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 14 posts in this stretch
    • I think we are in two different wiewpoints but standing on the same side of th efence, i am not Anti EV but i will not blithely accept the propaganda either, Evs are nice, improving a lot but also have a huge downside, that of manufacturer gategeeping on repair, Unavailability of spares to the general public and lack of a service and repair manual…

      johnyordinaryr/technology20h agoview on r/technology ↗
    • Wen@mastodon.scot

      This stud not be surprising. Simpler vehicles (at least the earlier ones are, silly electronic car ‘extensions’ might change reliability, although MOTs doesn’t check them) will be easier to keep running. MOTs are a simple metric, but probably a decent indicatr of trends https://www. theguardian.com/environment/20…

      Wen@mastodon.scotMastodon18h agoview on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →

What people are saying 12 voices from 2 sites · best of 15 · verbatim