AIQuiet 36h · day 2
Strogatz and Townsend: Math progress needs human trial-and-error, not just AI solutions
Applied mathematicians argue the creative process behind mathematical discovery matters as much as the answers AI can produce.
What to know
- Applied mathematicians warn against viewing mathematics as a problem-solving game for AI to win.
- The human creative process—trial, error, and exploration—has historically been central to mathematical progress.
- Solutions alone do not constitute the full value of mathematical discovery.
Steven Strogatz Applied mathematicianAlex Townsend Applied mathematician
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts
Sep 22yesterdaynow · 12:58 AM ET
-
1
Strogatz and Townsend publish essay on AI and mathematical progress
Applied mathematicians Steven Strogatz and Alex Townsend published an essay in the New York Times arguing that the human process of trial and error in mathematics has been historically central to progress, warning against viewing mathematics as merely a problem-solving game for AI.
“In our field of applied mathematics, the long, human process of trial and error — not just the solutions themselves — is often what has led to progress.”
— Steven Strogatz and Alex Townsend
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by NYT, 1d ago · also NYT Science, New York Times