Britt, Tuberville file amendment capping athlete revenue-share in college sports bill
Republican senators push to limit how much college athletes can earn through revenue-sharing and NIL deals under advancing Senate legislation.
What to know
- Britt and Tuberville's amendment would require NIL deals with sponsors, media partners, and collectives to count toward the $48.8 million revenue-share cap, closing a loophole where such agreements currently require only College Sports Commission approval.
- The Protect College Sports Act cleared its third procedural vote (70-21) on Tuesday and is on track for a full Senate floor vote this week, with House consideration delayed until mid-November.
- The bill would raise the revenue-share cap from the $21.3 million House settlement to $48.8 million total, split among high school recruits/transfers ($21.3M), retention ($22.5M), and non-revenue players ($5M).
- President Trump has pledged to sign the legislation and wants to do so on ESPN's College GameDay, providing political momentum for passage.
Katie Britt U.S. Senator (R-AL)
Tommy Tuberville U.S. Senator (R-AL)
Ted Cruz U.S. Senator (R-TX)
Maria Cantwell U.S. Senator (D-WA)
How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesposts
-
1
Protect College Sports Act clears procedural vote 70-21
The Senate passed another procedural vote on the Protect College Sports Act with 70 votes in favor and 21 opposed, with nine senators absent. The bill has now cleared three procedural hurdles as it moves toward a full floor vote.
“All name, image, and likeness agreement between a student athlete and an institution, an employee of an institution, a volunteer of an institution, a conference, an employee of a conference, or an associated entity shall count against the revenue-share cap of the institution.”
— Amendment text, Protect College Sports Act amendment · source -
2
Britt and Tuberville file revenue-share cap amendment
Two Alabama Republican senators filed an amendment to the Protect College Sports Act that would create a hard cap on athlete revenue-sharing, requiring all NIL agreements with associated entities (school sponsors, multimedia rights partners, and NIL collectives) to count toward the revenue-share cap.
-
1 outlet first by Yahoo Sports, 1d ago · read ↗
-
Sen. Katie Britt, with Sen. Tommy Tuberville, filed an amendment to the Protect College Sports Act that ensures a hard athlete rev-share cap by explicitly clarifying NIL funds from associated entities (school sponsors, MMR partners, collectives) count toward the cap.
-
-
background
Amendment seeks to close NIL loophole in revenue-share structure — The amendment explicitly clarifies that NIL funds from associated entities—school sponsors, multimedia rights partners, and NIL collectives—must count toward the institutional revenue-share cap, closing a gap in how the House settlement currently treats such agreements.