conv.

All stories
PoliticsQuiet 2d · day 3

Rubio invites Putin to G20 summit, drawing criticism

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the U.S. has invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the G20, prompting backlash over normalizing an indicted war criminal.

What to know

  • Secretary of State Rubio announced the U.S. has invited Putin to the G20 summit despite his ICC warrant for war crimes and alleged involvement in atrocities in Ukraine.
  • The move drew swift condemnation from social media users who view it as normalizing authoritarianism and contradicting stated U.S. values on international accountability.
  • Critics question whether this reflects alignment between the Trump administration and Putin, framing it as a departure from traditional diplomatic norms.

The dispute Whether inviting Putin serves legitimate diplomatic interest (keeping channels open) or constitutes unacceptable normalization of war crimes and authoritarianism. · positions read across 72 posts and comments

most voices

The invitation represents a dangerous normalization of authoritarianism and war crimes that contradicts U.S. values.

  • “Normalizing Putin is the same as normalizing imperialism and genocide.”

    jonas-haraldson.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
many voices

This reflects the Trump administration's admiration for Putin and alignment with authoritarian approaches to power.

  • “About the only constant of Trump from 2016 to now is that he really admires Putin. Putin feels aspirational to Trump.”

    goldensama.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

Other G20 members should boycott or hold a parallel summit without the U.S. and Russia.

  • “I've asked mark carney to convene an all-democracies version of the G20 right before then not attending Trump/rubio's fellating version …..and invite Ukraine too”

    tcishere.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

Marco RubioMarco Rubio U.S. Secretary of StateVladimir PutinVladimir Putin Russian President

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage postscomments

Peak 16 pieces in one hour at Sep 23, 6 PM; 72 pieces over 3 days (1 post · 71 comments) Sep 23, 6 PM — 16 pieces · 1 post · 15 comments — Bluesky 16Sep 23, 7 PM — 5 pieces · 5 comments — Bluesky 5Sep 23, 8 PM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Sep 23, 9 PM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Bluesky 4Sep 23, 10 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 23, 11 PM — quietSep 24, 12 AM — 8 pieces · 8 comments — Bluesky 8Sep 24, 1 AM — 6 pieces · 6 comments — Bluesky 6Sep 24, 2 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Sep 24, 3 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Sep 24, 4 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Bluesky 4Sep 24, 5 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 24, 6 AM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Bluesky 4Sep 24, 7 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Sep 24, 8 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Sep 24, 9 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Sep 24, 10 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 24, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Sep 24, 12 PM — quietSep 24, 1 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 24, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 24, 3 PM — quietSep 24, 4 PM — quietSep 24, 5 PM — quietSep 24, 6 PM — quietSep 24, 7 PM — quietSep 24, 8 PM — quietSep 24, 9 PM — quietSep 24, 10 PM — quietSep 24, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 3 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 6 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 9 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 3 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 1 AM — quietToday, 2 AM — quietToday, 3 AM — quietToday, 4 AM — quietToday, 5 AM — quietToday, 6 AM — quietToday, 7 AM — quietToday, 8 AM — quietToday, 9 AM — quietToday, 10 AM — quietToday, 11 AM — quietToday, 12 PM — quietToday, 1 PM — quietToday, 2 PM — quietToday, 3 PM — quietToday, 4 PM — quietToday, 5 PM — quiet 1
Sep 24yesterdaytodaynow · 6:20 PM ET
  1. 1

    Social media users condemn invitation to Putin

    Critics on Bluesky immediately responded with condemnation, characterizing the invitation as normalizing authoritarianism, war crimes, and genocide, while questioning the diplomatic wisdom of inviting an indicted leader.

    “Normalizing Putin is the same as normalizing imperialism and genocide. Then again, those are apparently concepts that fit well in the current White House.”
    — jonas-haraldson.bsky.social
    • kateinkharkiv.bsky.social

      Rubio: “We’ve invited Putin to the G20.” You’re an indicted war criminal, a mafia dictator, a bloody invader, and biggest monster of 21st century? Your army's committed thousands of war crimes? You’re helping Iran kill Americans? No problem, US will roll out red carpet for you!

      kateinkharkiv.bsky.socialBluesky2d ago1.4k▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 72 posts in this stretch
    • Normalizing Putin is the same as normalizing imperialism and genocide. Then again, those are apparently concepts that fit well in the current White House.

      jonas-haraldson.bsky.socialBluesky2d ago58▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • I’ve asked mark carney to convene an all-democracies version of the G20 right before then not attending Trump/rubio’s fellating version …..and invite Ukraine too

      tcishere.bsky.socialBluesky2d ago30▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. background

    Rubio announces U.S. invitation to Putin for G20 — Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States has invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the G20 summit.

What people are saying 21 voices from 1 site · best of 72 · verbatim

Still unanswered
  • Will other G20 members boycott or attend the summit if Putin is invited?
  • What is the stated diplomatic objective of inviting an indicted war criminal to the summit?