conv.

All stories
PoliticsMoving now · day 2

US Justice Department moves to back Musk's X in EU fine fight

The Trump administration asks the EU's General Court to annul Brussels' €120 million Digital Services Act fine against X.

What to know

  • The US filed to intervene in support of X and Musk's bid to annul the EU's first Digital Services Act fine, a €120 million penalty from December 2025.
  • DOJ argues the EU improperly extended jurisdiction to reach American companies and pierced the corporate veil to target Musk personally.
  • This is the first case challenging a DSA enforcement action to reach the EU's General Court, and the first US government intervention in such a case.
  • The move extends the Trump administration's broader criticism of EU tech regulation as unfairly targeting US companies.

“We will not tolerate the European Commission engaging in regulatory overreach to try and control American engines of innovation and economic growth.”

Brett Shumate, Assistant Attorney General, DOJ Civil Division · US Department of Justice press release ↗ · Sep 23

Elon MuskElon Musk Owner of XBrett Shumate Assistant Attorney General, DOJ Civil DivisionDonald TrumpDonald Trump US PresidentEuropean CommissionEuropean Commission EU executive body that issued the DSA fine

US Justice Department moves to back Musk's X in EU fine fight
justice.gov

How it unfolded 3 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlespostscomments

Peak 20 pieces in one hour at Sep 24, 3 PM; 102 pieces over 2 days (62 articles · 35 posts · 5 comments) Sep 24, 11 AM — 5 pieces · 4 articles · 1 post — Newswires 4, Mastodon 1Sep 24, 12 PM — quietSep 24, 1 PM — quietSep 24, 2 PM — quietSep 24, 3 PM — 20 pieces · 18 articles · 2 posts — Newswires 18, Bluesky 1, Mastodon 1Sep 24, 4 PM — quietSep 24, 5 PM — 2 pieces · 1 article · 1 post — Mastodon 1, Newswires 1Sep 24, 6 PM — 6 pieces · 3 articles · 3 posts — Mastodon 3, Newswires 3Sep 24, 7 PM — quietSep 24, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Sep 24, 9 PM — quietSep 24, 10 PM — quietSep 24, 11 PM — 2 pieces · 2 articles — Google News 1, Newswires 1Yesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — 4 pieces · 1 article · 3 posts — Mastodon 3, Newswires 1Yesterday, 3 AM — 4 pieces · 4 posts — Mastodon 2, Reddit 2Yesterday, 4 AM — 3 pieces · 1 post · 2 comments — Reddit 3Yesterday, 5 AM — 10 pieces · 8 articles · 2 posts — Google News 4, Newswires 4, Mastodon 2Yesterday, 6 AM — 3 pieces · 1 article · 2 posts — Mastodon 2, Newswires 1Yesterday, 7 AM — 8 pieces · 3 articles · 2 posts · 3 comments — Reddit 4, Newswires 2, Google News 1, +1 moreYesterday, 8 AM — 4 pieces · 2 articles · 2 posts — Mastodon 2, Newswires 2Yesterday, 9 AM — 8 pieces · 5 articles · 3 posts — Newswires 5, Bluesky 2, Mastodon 1Yesterday, 10 AM — 6 pieces · 3 articles · 3 posts — Mastodon 3, Google News 1, Hacker News 1, +1 moreYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — 9 pieces · 8 articles · 1 post — Google News 7, Hacker News 1, Newswires 1Yesterday, 1 PM — 1 piece · 1 article — Newswires 1Yesterday, 2 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Bluesky 1Yesterday, 3 PM — 2 pieces · 1 article · 1 post — Mastodon 1, Newswires 1Yesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 9 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 1 AM — quietToday, 2 AM — quietToday, 3 AM — quietToday, 4 AM — quietToday, 5 AM — quietToday, 6 AM — quietToday, 7 AM — quietToday, 8 AM — quietToday, 9 AM — quietToday, 10 AM — quietToday, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Today, 12 PM — quietToday, 1 PM — quietToday, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 1 article · 1 post — Mastodon 2 123
yesterdaytodaynow · 3:18 PM ET
  1. 3

    Coverage frames move within Trump administration's broader EU tech fight

    Reports note the intervention fits a pattern of the Trump administration criticizing Europe's Big Tech crackdown as targeting American companies, while the European Commission maintains its laws are nationality-neutral and defend digital and democratic standards.

    “the “corporate veil” principle, which is fundamental to the U.S. economic and legal system … provides that there is, in general, no entitlement to look behind the corporate structure in order to take action against shareholders…”
    — US Department of Justice, US government filing · source
    1. first by Seeking Alpha, 1d ago · also ITVX, Anadolu Agency, RTE News, France 24 EN, France 24, CP24 +11

      8 more headlines
    2. first by CNBC, 1d ago · also FT, Reuters, Straits Times, Channel News Asia, Jerusalem Post

      3 more headlines
    1 more claim →
    • The US backs Elon Musk in fight to overturn €120M EU fine. Trump officials filed a motion to support X’s appeal, arguing the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) enforcement overreached when levying the fine last December, and unfairly targets American tech platforms while threatening digital free speech and global market operations. “The European…

      thomas_ricker@theverge.spaceMastodon1d ago1▲view on Mastodon ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 17 posts in this stretch
    • The dispute resolution body, Impress Dispute Resolutions (IDR), is an Irish-registered company and was given certification for five years. IDR’s remit is resolution of disputes relating to some categories of illegal content published on social-media platforms and content-sharing sites. According to IDR, this includes disputes relating to hate…

      Tyromanticsr/worldnews1d agoview on r/worldnews ↗
    • maqsoodasi.bsky.social

      The #US government is seeking to join Elon Musk's legal challenge to overturn a €120m (£105m) #EU fine against #X over its #BlueTick badges.

      maqsoodasi.bsky.socialBluesky1d agoview on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. 2

    DOJ filing details corporate-veil and jurisdiction arguments

    The Justice Department's filing says the Commission's approach to attributing DSA liability improperly pierced the corporate veil, extending scrutiny to Musk personally and unrelated companies he owns, and raises concerns about extraterritorial jurisdiction consistent with international law.

    • newsguyusa@flipboard.social

      The US government wants to help Elon Musk in his legal appeal of the EU-imposed €120 million fine against his social media platform formerly known as Twitter. https://www. justice.gov/opa/pr/united-stat es-files-request-intervene-case-brought-x-corp-and-elon-musk-seeking-annul

      newsguyusa@flipboard.socialMastodon1d agoview on Mastodon ↗
    1 more of the top 2 · 2 posts in this stretch
    • United States Department of Justice is asking to intervene, on behalf of Musk, on the European Commission's enforcement of its Digital Services Act on the X platform. —

      @jagolinzerBluesky1d agoview on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  3. 1

    DOJ files application to intervene in X's EU court case

    The U.S. Justice Department filed a request with the EU's General Court in Luxembourg to intervene in support of X Internet/X Holdings v. Commission and Musk v. Commission, seeking annulment of the December 2025 fine.

    “The European Commission inappropriately attempted to expand its regulatory authority to reach American companies not present or operating within its jurisdiction.”
    — Brett Shumate, Assistant Attorney General
    1. first by Bloomberg, 2d ago · also Bloomberg Politics

  4. background

    EU Commission fines X €120 million under the DSA — EU tech regulators sanctioned X for breaching online content rules following a two-year investigation, the first fine issued under the Digital Services Act.

Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet

  1. first by Quartz, 1d ago · also UPI, Globe and Mail, CBC

    3 more headlines
  2. first by The Economic Times, 1d ago · also Associated Press

    1 more headline

and 6 smaller pieces

What people are saying 12 voices from 2 sites · best of 19 · verbatim