Tech writer argues humanities are essential as AI commoditizes technical skills
An essay on Hacker News contends that philosophy, literature, and linguistics are now more valuable than coding prowess in technology work.
What to know
- A tech writer argues that humanities training—philosophy, literature, linguistics, history, anthropology—is now more valuable than technical skills as AI commoditizes coding and fact-retrieval work.
- The essay contends that ethical judgment and independent reasoning, developed through humanistic study, create durable professional advantage and guard against AI becoming a medium for thoughtless work.
- Hacker News discussion splits between supporters who cite personal experience with transformative humanities courses and skeptics who argue the real barrier is capital incentive rather than education, or question whether the essay merely advocates for skills AI hasn't yet disrupted.
The dispute Whether humanistic education is a solution to technology's ethical problems or merely a rhetorical defense of humanities disciplines against disruption, and whether structural market incentives would undermine any individual's humanistic training regardless. · positions read across 16 posts and comments
Humanities training develops critical thinking and ethical judgment that AI cannot replicate, making it essential for technology work.
-
“Working with AI code generators, you see the need to be able to dig deep and dig out the unsaid in an argument. You need to appreciate and have a feel for language's ambiguities to make sure the right thing is done.”
mattgoupil · Hacker News ↗
Market incentives and capital accumulation, not lack of education, drive technology's problems; humanities won't fix systemic issues.
-
“It's not the lack of humanities that got us here, it's the search to increase capital.”
hyfgfh · Hacker News ↗
The essay is essentially advocating for skills AI hasn't yet disrupted; real humanities insights applied to tech are far rarer than calls for more humanities.
-
“I've seen about 100x more content like "tech needs humanities" than I've seen like "here's a brilliant humanities insight which can be applied to tech". Seems suspicious.”
0xDEAFBEAD · Hacker News ↗
University humanities education often fails to develop moral judgment; early cultivation of humanistic interest is more important than late degree requirements.
-
“The issue is, I don't think that university humanities courses generally contribute much to a person's moral development, and if they do, it's not always necessarily in a positive way.”
harpersealtako · Hacker News ↗
eigenBasis Tech writer and essayist
How it unfolded 5 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlespostscomments
-
5
Commenters share experiences of humanities courses transforming their thinking
Several commenters affirm the essay's thesis through personal experience, describing humanities courses that opened their eyes to complex thinking and broadened their understanding of technology's role in society.
“Working with AI code generators, you see the need to be able to dig deep and dig out the unsaid in an argument. You need to appreciate and have a feel for language's ambiguities to make sure the right thing is done.”
— mattgoupil -
The issue is, I don't think that university humanities courses generally contribute much to a person's moral development, and if they do, it's not always necessarily in a positive way (as anybody who has taken enough university humanities courses can tell you). Interest in the humanities is something that should be cultivated much earlier in life…
2 more of the top 3 · 3 posts in this stretch
-
Yes, especially people who subscribe to humanism as a philosophy. Studying humanities is of course great too! I didn't realize from the title that that was more what the article is about, not about the philosophical idea.Since the article calls for learning more languages, I hope it's alright if I mention a still in-progress experiment of mine. I…
-
You can distill it down to: don't be a piece of shit, think carefully about how what you're building is used, talk to real humans and listen to them, and stop driving your product development process mimetically. Instead, solve real problems that real people have (not people in SF; I'm talking deep reality like a 60 y/o woman who had to get a job…
-
-
4
Commenters highlight AI's structural inability to make value judgments as a key opening for human thought
Discussion notes that while AI may eventually perform historical analysis, it cannot inherently make ethical judgments—requiring external guidance on what is good, right, or useful, creating permanent space for human philosophical reasoning.
“AI, in principle, can't have a value judgement though. It needs external "oracle" to tell good from bad, right from wrong, useful from useless.”
— crabbone -
> the only way forward is down to the roots of human thought and theoryI see this as both too vague and not really being in the right direction. AI today can't do a good historical review / not enough ability to analyze? -- It's not implausible that it will get there some day. AI, in principle, can't have a value judgement though. It needs…
-
-
3
Critics question whether the essay amounts to protecting humanities from AI disruption
Some commenters express skepticism about the framing, noting they see far more "tech needs humanities" arguments than actual humanities insights applied to technology, or suggesting the essay is essentially advocating for skills AI hasn't yet displaced.
“I've seen about 100x more content like "tech needs humanities" than I've seen like "here's a brilliant humanities insight which can be applied to tech". Seems suspicious.”
— 0xDEAFBEAD -
It's idealistic but I love it. I've been thinking a lot about this.At my alma mater they forced all of us to take a couple of humanities courses. They were actually the highlight of my senior year. I do believe it's something that's quite lacking in an number/outcome-based education that should actually strive to produce well rounded individuals…
2 more of the top 3 · 7 posts in this stretch
-
I studied maths & CS but my favourite course at uni was a politics course, so not a real humanity but it opened my eyes.The course was a seminar on the 20th Century Politics of Japan with ~10 students.Lots of great questions around the fall of imperial Japan and about what democracy means in Japan for example what would a socialist or communist…
-
I agree with the author. Working with AI code generators, you see the need to be able to dig deep and dig out the unsaid in an argument. You need to appreciate and have a feel for language's ambiguities to make sure the right thing is done.Also, aesthetics is an underrated part of writing good code, and that requires a broad exposure to human…
-
-
2
Commenters debate whether humanities study alone addresses the problem
Hacker News discussion develops with some commenters supporting the essay's thesis while others argue the real barriers are market incentives and capital accumulation rather than lack of humanistic training, or question whether university humanities courses have measurable impact on moral development.
“It's not the lack of humanities that got us here, it's the search to increase capital.”
— hyfgfh -
I like the approach that the writer takes, emphasizing the importance of humanistic experience into technology. Language will be the deciding factor for what technology becomes, and on this point I have some critique of the language that the author uses.> Become the most flexible, underscore-shaped mind you can cultivate, the best-prepared…
2 more of the top 3 · 4 posts in this stretch
-
I like the idealism, but an important factor making this viable is that people (i.e. employers) must realise that this fundamental reasoning is scarce and pay enough for it to support life, and this must happen before AI takes over.
-
i totally agree with this, but i think at this point there's no going back, this AI wave isn't stopping anytime soon and it will continue growing.
-
-
1
Essay published arguing humanities are essential for tech careers
An essay titled "Tech Needs Humanists More" appears on Hacker News, contending that as AI handles factual retrieval and technical boilerplate, professional advantage now lies in deep thinking, language mastery, and ethical reasoning developed through study of philosophy, literature, linguistics, history, and anthropology.
“When AI can take care of retrieving facts and putting words together in reassuringly trite ways, your edge as a carbon-based lifeform lies in your ability to go deep, have stances, and know how to convey and defend them.”
— eigenBasis -
1 outlet Tech Needs Humanists More
first by HN Frontpage, 1d ago
-
H
Tech Needs Humanists More L: https:// passo.uno/tech-needs-humanists -more-than-ever/ C: https:// news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4 9842127 posted on 2026.09.25 at 05:31:34 (c=0, p=5)
-
What people are saying 3 voices from 1 site · best of 16 · verbatim
- Yesterday
-
It’s not only about not doing evil. Humanities train your brain in ways hard sciences usually don’t.But I do agree ethics is a big one.
-
I'm sorry, but to me this just reads like someone who is high on their own supply? Seems like a lot of words to say that people should diversify into skills that AI is bad at...for now.
-
People often complain about the humanities requirements for CS degrees, and now the world is run by tech executives who don’t have a clue.