conv.

All stories
ScienceQuiet 8d · day 10

OpenAI and Anthropic both claim to have disproved the Exponential Time Hypothesis

AI systems from both labs produced proofs undermining a 27-year-old pillar of theoretical computer science, upending decades of complexity-theory research overnight.

What to know

  • OpenAI and Anthropic each claim their AI models disproved the exponential time hypothesis, a 27-year-old pillar of theoretical computer science.
  • The proofs, posted on GitHub in natural language and Lean format, have not yet been independently verified by researchers.
  • Scholars whose careers were built on ETH describe large portions of their published work as suddenly obsolete, while others call the moment thrilling rather than demoralizing.
  • OpenAI is organizing a verification effort with the hypothesis's original proposers and funding a conference to unpack the result.

“The last few months have been really tough. It's a lot of doom and gloom, because every week, or every second week, the results announced by AI just ann…”

Unnamed researcher, quoted in article (truncated) · Wired ↗ · Oct 28

Peter Jonsson Linköping University professorDaniel Lokshtanov UC Santa Barbara professor, original ETH co-proposerThore Husfeldt Head of algorithms research group, IT University of CopenhagenOpenAI AI lab claiming the ETH disproofAnthropic AI lab claiming the ETH disproof

OpenAI and Anthropic both claim to have disproved the Exponential Time Hypothesis
wired.com

The record 1 articles and posts · last 10 days

  1. An AI Breakthrough Has Made Decades of Computer Science Research ‘Irrelevant’ press · Google News · Business · WIRED · 10d ago · +1 outlet