OpenAI to train on Daybreak Blue sessions even when users opted out
An email notifying personal-account users of a Nov 29 policy change triggers accusations that OpenAI is overriding explicit opt-outs.
What to know
- OpenAI told personal-account Daybreak Blue users by email that, from Nov 29, session content may be used to improve models even if they had opted out via 'Improve the model for everyone.'
- Users, including security researchers who say their sessions often involve sensitive data, call the move a betrayal of an explicit opt-out and warn it could end their use of the product.
- One user posted a formal written objection sent to OpenAI demanding justification and said they would consult legal counsel; no OpenAI response is reported.
- It remains unclear whether or how users can restore an opt-out, including for usage via tools like the Codex CLI on personal accounts.
The dispute Little pushback defending OpenAI appears in the evidence; the main tension is practical — whether users can still technically opt out (e.g. via the Codex CLI) versus accepting the override as final. · positions read across 2 posts and comments
OpenAI is overriding an explicit opt-out and effectively taking users' private work without consent.
-
“This is a dirty trick imo to steal our work.”
OpenAI community forum user · OpenAI Community forum ↗
This specifically threatens security researchers because Daybreak sessions routinely involve sensitive material.
-
“It also will presumably kill Daybreak usage by security researchers.”
@seanhn · X ↗
Affected users will simply stop using Daybreak rather than accept the new training terms.
-
“If there’s no way to opt out, I’ll probably just stop using Daybreak. I really hope OpenAI reconsiders this.”
OpenAI community forum user · OpenAI Community forum ↗
OpenAI Developer of Daybreak Blue@seanhn X user who surfaced the storyDaybreak Blue users (OpenAI community forum) Affected personal-account customers
How it unfolded 3 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump posts
-
3
User sends formal written objection, threatens legal counsel
On OpenAI's community forum, multiple Daybreak Blue users criticize the change as overriding their opt-out; one user posts the text of a formal objection email sent to OpenAI demanding a written explanation and says they will consult legal counsel.
“This is a dirty trick imo to steal our work.”
— OpenAI community forum user -
2
Post spreads to Mastodon as outrage builds
The claim is reshared on Mastodon, extending the backlash beyond X and Hacker News into other social platforms.
-
J
OpenAI is planning to use data from personal Daybreak Blue usage to train models, even if you're opted out otherwise. https:// x.com/seanhn/status/2116254333 054693776
-
-
1
@seanhn calls the change 'cartoonishly evil'
A viral X post accuses OpenAI of training on private Daybreak Blue sessions with no opt-out, warning it will discourage security researchers from using the product.
“Literally stealing people's private work, as they do it, is cartoonishly evil.”
— @seanhn -
haha, so apparently OpenAI are about to start training on your Daybreak Blue sessions, with no way to opt out. Literally stealing people's private work, as they do it, is cartoonishly evil. It also will presumably kill Daybreak usage by security researchers. Or at least, it
-
-
background
OpenAI emails users about Nov 29 Daybreak Blue training change — A Daybreak Blue user on a personal account reports receiving an email stating that from November 29 onward, OpenAI may use content from Daybreak Blue sessions to improve its models, apparently regardless of a prior opt-out of 'Improve the model for everyone.'
What people are saying 0 voices from 0 sites · best of 2 · verbatim
- How can a user restore opt-out status after using Daybreak, and does it even apply to CLI-based usage on personal accounts?
- Will OpenAI respond to the formal objection or clarify the legal basis for applying the change to previously submitted content?