conv.

All stories
AIQuiet 12d · day 12

Ali Alkhatib argues AI definitions miss the point for activists

Scholar critiques academic frameworks for defining AI as functionally useless for people resisting these systems.

newest coverage 11d agosummary written 11d ago6 pieces508 likes & upvotes7 comments MastodonHacker NewsBluesky

What to know

  • Alkhatib critiques academic AI definitions as focusing on technical criteria (like how behavior emerges) that are meaningless to users who cannot inspect opaque systems, especially in domains like insurance.
  • He reframes AI as fundamentally political—designed to shift authority from individuals to centralized power—rather than as a neutral technology with incidental political consequences.
  • The essay argues that definitions divorced from the practical needs of activists and people harmed by these systems serve only to entrench expert gatekeeping, not to make the systems more accountable.
most voices

Technical definitions of AI are useless without addressing power and opacity.

  • “The main issue I have with a lot of work that tries to define AI is that the criteria they use to draw boundaries often turn out to be functionally useless for my needs”

    Ali Alkhatib · ali-alkhatib.com blog ↗
many voices

AI is fundamentally a political and ideological project, not merely a technical category.

  • “I think we should shed the idea that AI is a technological artifact with political features and recognize it as a political artifact through and through. AI is an ideological project to shift authority and autonomy away from individuals…”

    Ali Alkhatib · Mastodon ↗

Ali Alkhatib Scholar and essayistNaranayan and Kapoor Authors of "AI Snake Oil"

Ali Alkhatib argues AI definitions miss the point for activists
ali-alkhatib.com

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage posts

Peak 3 pieces in 3h at Oct 30, 2 PM; 6 pieces over 12 days (6 posts) Oct 30, 2 PM — 3 pieces · 3 posts — Mastodon 2, Bluesky 1Oct 30, 5 PM — 2 pieces · 2 posts — Hacker News 1, Mastodon 1Oct 30, 8 PM — quietOct 30, 11 PM — quietOct 31, 2 AM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Oct 31, 5 AM — quietOct 31, 8 AM — quietOct 31, 11 AM — quietOct 31, 2 PM — quietOct 31, 5 PM — quietOct 31, 8 PM — quietOct 31, 11 PM — quietNov 1, 1 AM — quietNov 1, 4 AM — quietNov 1, 7 AM — quietNov 1, 10 AM — quietNov 1, 1 PM — quietNov 1, 4 PM — quietNov 1, 7 PM — quietNov 1, 10 PM — quietNov 2, 1 AM — quietNov 2, 4 AM — quietNov 2, 7 AM — quietNov 2, 10 AM — quietNov 2, 1 PM — quietNov 2, 4 PM — quietNov 2, 7 PM — quietNov 2, 10 PM — quietNov 3, 1 AM — quietNov 3, 4 AM — quietNov 3, 7 AM — quietNov 3, 10 AM — quietNov 3, 1 PM — quietNov 3, 4 PM — quietNov 3, 7 PM — quietNov 3, 10 PM — quietNov 4, 1 AM — quietNov 4, 4 AM — quietNov 4, 7 AM — quietNov 4, 10 AM — quietNov 4, 1 PM — quietNov 4, 4 PM — quietNov 4, 7 PM — quietNov 4, 10 PM — quietNov 5, 1 AM — quietNov 5, 4 AM — quietNov 5, 7 AM — quietNov 5, 10 AM — quietNov 5, 1 PM — quietNov 5, 4 PM — quietNov 5, 7 PM — quietNov 5, 10 PM — quietNov 6, 1 AM — quietNov 6, 4 AM — quietNov 6, 7 AM — quietNov 6, 10 AM — quietNov 6, 1 PM — quietNov 6, 4 PM — quietNov 6, 7 PM — quietNov 6, 10 PM — quietNov 7, 1 AM — quietNov 7, 4 AM — quietNov 7, 7 AM — quietNov 7, 10 AM — quietNov 7, 1 PM — quietNov 7, 4 PM — quietNov 7, 7 PM — quietNov 7, 10 PM — quietNov 8, 1 AM — quietNov 8, 4 AM — quietNov 8, 7 AM — quietNov 8, 10 AM — quietNov 8, 1 PM — quietNov 8, 4 PM — quietNov 8, 7 PM — quietNov 8, 10 PM — quietNov 9, 1 AM — quietNov 9, 4 AM — quietNov 9, 7 AM — quietNov 9, 10 AM — quietNov 9, 1 PM — quietNov 9, 4 PM — quietNov 9, 7 PM — quietNov 9, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 1 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 7 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 1 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 7 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 1 AM — quietToday, 4 AM — quietToday, 7 AM — quietToday, 10 AM — quietToday, 1 PM — quietToday, 4 PM — quietToday, 7 PM — quiet 1
Oct 31Nov 1Nov 2Nov 3Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9yesterdaynow · 8:40 PM ET
  1. 1

    Essay gains traction on social media

    The essay circulates across social platforms including Bluesky and Mastodon, with users sharing and endorsing Alkhatib's critique of AI definition frameworks. Multiple users highlighted the work as worth reading in full.

    “The main issue I have with a lot of work that tries to define AI is that the criteria they use to draw boundaries often turn out to be functionally useless for my needs…Those pedantic fixations don't really benefit the organizers, activists, regular people who are getting crushed by the systems they're trying to work against.”
    — Ali Alkhatib, Scholar · source

    • I think we should shed the idea that AI is a technological artifact with political features and recognize it as a political artifact through and through. AI is an ideological project to shift authority and autonomy away from individuals, towards centralized structures of power. Projects that claim to “democratize” AI routinely conflate…

      adrienne@treehouse.systemsMastodon12d ago9▲view on Mastodon ↗
    1 more of the top 2 · 5 posts in this stretch
    • susankayequinn@wandering.shop

      I *really* like this quote from Ali Alkhatib in his short essay defining AI which is worth reading in its entirety: https:// ali-alkhatib.com/blog/defining -ai

      susankayequinn@wandering.shopMastodon12d ago3▲view on Mastodon ↗
    all of them →
  2. background

    Alkhatib argues AI is inherently political, not merely a technical category — In commentary on the essay, Alkhatib frames AI as fundamentally a political project rather than a neutral technological artifact. He argues that projects claiming to democratize AI often conflate democratization with commodification, and that even open-source AI borrows from libertarian ideologies.

  3. background

    Alkhatib publishes essay critiquing AI definition frameworks — Ali Alkhatib released an essay arguing that academic and popular attempts to define AI rely on criteria that are "functionally useless" for activists and ordinary people affected by these systems. He specifically examines the three-question framework from "AI Snake Oil" by Naranayan and Kapoor.

What people are saying 0 voices from 0 sites · best of 5 · verbatim