Japanese commentators fault government's 'emergency request' wording for public alarm
A government call for stockpiling and inspections, framed as an 'emergency request', is criticized for needlessly alarming the public.
What to know
- Critics say a Japanese government 'emergency request' (緊急要請) calling for stockpiling and inspections used alarming language that made people fear something like a cyberattack was underway.
- Commentator Mitsuko Uenishi and a Tokyo Shimbun journalist both say the phrasing itself, not the underlying situation, caused the confusion.
- The underlying details of what exactly was being stockpiled or inspected are not specified in the available material.
Mitsuko Uenishi Commentator (@mu0283)菅沼 (Suganuma) Tokyo Shimbun journalist / 新聞力研究所
How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump posts
-
2
Tokyo Shimbun reporter says the wording caused public anxiety
A Tokyo Shimbun journalist (Suganuma) reposts and agrees with Uenishi, saying he was personally asked whether a cyberattack or similar emergency was occurring, and criticizes officials for not acknowledging that their own messaging caused confusion.
“同感だ。「サイバー攻撃か何かが起きるのか」と私も聞かれた。「緊急要請」の言葉に不安になった方は少なくないだろう。自分たちの発信は顧みず、「誤解することのないように」と、いつもの上から目線…”
— 菅沼 (Tokyo Shimbun / 新聞力研究所) -
K
上西充子さん: 「ならば「緊急要請」とは言わず、「備蓄・点検行動週間」ぐらいの呼びかけにしておけばよかったのでは。 「緊急要請」と言われれば、身構えるのは当然でしょう。」 / X https:// x.com/mu0283/status/2116419596 337246312 東京新聞の菅沼さん➡新聞力研究所の菅沼さんさん: 「同感だ。「サイバー攻撃か何かが起きるのか」と私も聞かれた。「緊急要請」の言葉に不安になった方は少なくないだろう。自分たちの発信は顧みず、「誤解することのないように」と、いつもの上から目線」 / X https:// x.com/uchisaiwaichoTK/status/2 116753913429078436
-
-
1
Uenishi criticizes government's 'emergency request' phrasing
Commentator Mitsuko Uenishi posts that officials should have called the campaign something like a 'stockpile and inspection action week' instead of an 'emergency request,' arguing the latter naturally puts people on edge.