Scott Alexander's "Against SURA" essay challenges AI safety's anti-race consensus
A LessWrong essay argues alignment-focused AI labs should keep the option of racing to a lead and "burning" it on alignment research, not just pushing for a global pause.
What to know
- The essay frames AI safety strategy as a choice between "Plan A" (global pause) and "Plan C" (alignment-focused labs race to a lead, then burn it on alignment research).
- Scott Alexander argues the AI safety community has overcorrected toward "SURA" — treating unilateral stopping and awareness-raising as the only ethical option — and risks abandoning a viable fallback plan.
- Early reaction from researcher Boaz Barak shows partial agreement but pushes back on framing the choice as a binary, pointing to a spectrum of intermediate strategies.
Scott Alexander Author of the "Against SURA" essayBoaz Barak AI researcher reacting on XAI Futures Project Group whose Plan A/B/C/D framework the essay builds on
How it unfolded 2 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesposts
-
2
Boaz Barak offers qualified agreement on X
Barak responds to the essay saying he agrees with parts of it but argues there is a wide spectrum of options between unilaterally stopping and racing to RSI at maximum speed.
“Quick comment on Scott Alexander's SURA essay. I agree with several parts of it, but there is a huge spectrum between "stop unilaterally" and "race to RSI at maximum speed, then try to solve alignment with right-on-the-brink-of-superintelligence AIs.”
— Boaz Barak -
Quick comment on Scott Alexander's SURA essay. I agree with several parts of it, but there is a huge spectrum between “stop unilaterally” and “race to RSI at maximum speed, then try to solve alignment with right-on-the-brink-of-superintelligence AIs.
-
-
1
Scott Alexander publishes "Against SURA" essay
The essay distinguishes "Plan A" (a global pause on AI development) from "Plan C" (alignment-pilled labs racing to a lead, then burning that lead on alignment research before rivals catch up), and argues the community has swung too far toward treating only Plan A as ethical.
“I'll lump these ideas together under the heading of "SURA" - the idea that the only ethical course is for people/companies/countries to Stop Unilaterally + Raise…”
— Scott Alexander