Proton CEO dismisses security concerns as 'loser thinking' in leaked Slack chat
404 Media investigation reveals Andy Yen pressuring engineers to adopt AI coding despite security objections.
What to know
- 404 Media investigation exposed leaked Slack messages showing Proton CEO Andy Yen dismissing a security engineer's testing request as "bullshit and loser thinking" while pressuring adoption of AI-assisted coding.
- The controversy centers on leadership priorities—speed over security—rather than AI coding itself; other companies use AI without humiliating staff, analysts note.
- For a privacy-focused company selling user confidence in careful engineering, a security breach could be catastrophic; users are questioning whether Proton's core value proposition is being sacrificed for velocity.
Andy Yen Proton CEO404 Media Investigative outletRaed667 Technology commentator and Proton user
How it unfolded 0 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump
-
background
Raed667 publishes analysis framing story as leadership failure, not AI failure — Raed667, a long-time Proton user, argues the problem is not AI-assisted coding itself but Proton's leadership treating security constraints as obstacles. The piece notes employees defending the company on Reddit appear to be in alignment with corporate messaging rather than genuinely dissenting.
-
background
404 Media publishes investigation into Proton's AI push and CEO's dismissal of security concerns — 404 Media investigation revealed internal Slack exchanges in which CEO Andy Yen called an engineer's request for security testing "bullshit and loser thinking" and instructed the team to use AI more and stop "lovingly handcrafting code."
What people are saying 16 voices from 1 site · verbatim
- Nov 3
-
I read the AI 'manifesto' that the CTO posted and I have to say I'm very much not impressed.There are several different approaches they could have taken to leverage AI to create a more secure product for their users, but there was no mention of it.As a long-time paying Proton customer I have regularly given them feedback to stop with the AI…
- Nov 2
-
that the CEO of Proton doesn't get this -- that security is the reason, and their userbase is cool w/ the slowness -- then I don't think the company is salvageable until he leaves.it's a complete mis-read of literally everything they have to offer, the raison d'être for using Proton.now I gotta wonder what other stupid bullshit is this idiot going…
-
This is mainly confirmation of an uneasy feeling I've had for a while.I already didn't like it when they started to expand into a suite of products. Passwords was fine, but then came VPN, and Drive, and Calendar, and each time I was less and less comfortable that a company which was supposed to be nice, private email was splitting their focus so…
- Nov 1
-
> Proton is a privacy company, though, and what its users pay for is the confidence that the people building it are careful. Shipping slowly and carefully is part of what they’re selling.Totally agree. I pay for Proton because I choose to trust their business practices more than Google. If Proton continues to move in this direction and hemorrhage…
-
I only considered Proton for security/privacy.Their lots of half-baked products added since already reminded me of the Mozilla slide to irrelevance.This seals the deal. I am OK if they use AI to enhace their productivity. I do care if they want to use AI to "move fast and break things" not giving a damn for stability and careful testing, think…
-
As a proton customer myself, I've changed email providers before, and it isn't easy.When I recommend for someone to try proton, I recommend they do so with a custom domain for their email address.That way, if something goes awry at proton, they can set up service elsewhere while keeping their same email address.
-
I'm a paying proton customer, I migrated last year from the horror that is Office365 (or Copilot 365 or whatever they call it now) and before that I migrated from Google Workspace. In direct comparisson, proton is the best product for me - and that does not include privacy or security things, just stuff like generall UX and featureset. Yes, they…
-
From 404's reporting,> “Due to insufficient velocity,” Proton is not on track to achieve its annual recurring revenue target by the end of the year, one internal document obtained by 404 Media reads. Proton’s year-over-year growth is also “far away from what the market today considers to be good,” and, “By all metrics that matter, we’re an…
-
> I do wonder who would be demanding that Proton move faster.Whenever I see "hosted in Switzerland" my mind immediately goes to the Crypto AG scandal.
-
I've had one eye on the Proton exit since they made it clear they were not disintangled from Big Tech nor politically neutral. Then they kept blocking discussions about it on their reddit:
-
Don't know if Proton has any shareholders, but I they do, I hope they understand the CEO's position has become untenable, no matter his other real or imaginary qualities. It is (surprisingly) not uncommon for CEO's to have no clue about the business they are leading, but most of them at a minimum understand they should not spook their own…
-
I hazard a better reasoning: The walled garden made it's users too valueable to not sell out to whatever forces it can find.Apple is deeply in this camp; all it takes is one MBA's desire for bonuses to break the damn.Corporations in unregulated waters are only as solid as the last captain.
-
>Meta doesn't want to be a social media company - so it lets facebook rot, makes 10% of its total revenue from scammers advertising to its customers, which seem to mostly be vulnerable old people and focuses on VR and AI.Are you just going to ignore the rest of advertising that isn't "scammers advertising to its customers", and makes up the…
-
"For most companies, trading some caution for speed is a reasonable call. Proton is a privacy company, though, and what its users pay for is the confidence that the people building it are careful. Shipping slowly and carefully is part of what they’re selling"This is the core of it for me. There are many, maaany companies that don't want to be what…
-
> Beyond the clumsiness, it shows a leadership that now treats the constraints that made Proton worth paying for as the thing slowing it down.Exactly. The product is security and privacy. The thing being sold is that. If anyone could justify being slower to pentest, it is Proton.I do wonder who would be demanding that Proton move faster. Would any…
-
Related:"Manifestos, Fear, and 'Loser Thinking': Inside Proton's AI Reckoning" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50289692 90 comments"Proton goes all in on using AI" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50296602 117 comments"Proton to 'Re-Interview' Staff About AI to See Who Gets to Keep Their Job" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50251062…