conv.

All stories
PoliticsQuiet 8d · day 9

Supreme Court denies Trump DOJ emergency stay in California election case

The Court rejected the Justice Department's request without requesting opposition briefs, one day before the election.

What to know

  • The Supreme Court rejected a Trump DOJ emergency stay request in a California election case on November 2 without dissent and without requesting opposition briefs—an unusually swift and definitive rejection.
  • The decision came one day before the 2026 election, affecting the timeline of the underlying case.
  • Marc Elias and his law group won the case; the Court's action blocked what Elias characterized as an overreach by the executive branch.

The dispute No substantive disagreement is evident in the comments; virtually all voices support the Court's decision and praise Elias. · positions read across 116 posts and comments

most voices

The Supreme Court correctly rejected an authoritarian executive overreach and defended judicial independence and democracy.

  • “No dissents. No response briefs even requested. SCOTUS treated DOJ's emergency election grab like junk mail and tossed it the night before Election Day.”

    ctrlaltresist.com · Bluesky ↗
some voices

The case itself was unconstitutional pre-crime—attempting to stop something that has not happened and likely never will.

  • “This whole CA case is similar to Minority Report in that the regime wants to stop something that hasn't even happened & in all probability, prolly never will. Pre-crime is not a thing in the constitution.”

    marycateismary.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

Marc EliasMarc Elias Election lawyer, Elias Law GroupTrump Department of Justice PetitionerSupreme Court Judicial authority

Supreme Court denies Trump DOJ emergency stay in California election case
bsky.app

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage postscomments

Peak 106 pieces in 3h at Nov 2, 5 PM; 116 pieces over 9 days (1 post · 115 comments) Nov 2, 5 PM — 106 pieces · 1 post · 105 comments — Bluesky 106Nov 2, 8 PM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Nov 2, 11 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Nov 3, 2 AM — quietNov 3, 5 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Nov 3, 8 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Nov 3, 11 AM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Nov 3, 2 PM — quietNov 3, 5 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Nov 3, 8 PM — quietNov 3, 11 PM — quietNov 4, 2 AM — quietNov 4, 5 AM — quietNov 4, 8 AM — quietNov 4, 11 AM — quietNov 4, 2 PM — quietNov 4, 5 PM — quietNov 4, 8 PM — quietNov 4, 11 PM — quietNov 5, 2 AM — quietNov 5, 5 AM — quietNov 5, 8 AM — quietNov 5, 11 AM — quietNov 5, 2 PM — quietNov 5, 5 PM — quietNov 5, 8 PM — quietNov 5, 11 PM — quietNov 6, 2 AM — quietNov 6, 5 AM — quietNov 6, 8 AM — quietNov 6, 11 AM — quietNov 6, 2 PM — quietNov 6, 5 PM — quietNov 6, 8 PM — quietNov 6, 11 PM — quietNov 7, 2 AM — quietNov 7, 5 AM — quietNov 7, 8 AM — quietNov 7, 11 AM — quietNov 7, 2 PM — quietNov 7, 5 PM — quietNov 7, 8 PM — quietNov 7, 11 PM — quietNov 8, 2 AM — quietNov 8, 5 AM — quietNov 8, 8 AM — quietNov 8, 11 AM — quietNov 8, 2 PM — quietNov 8, 5 PM — quietNov 8, 8 PM — quietNov 8, 11 PM — quietNov 9, 2 AM — quietNov 9, 5 AM — quietNov 9, 8 AM — quietNov 9, 11 AM — quietNov 9, 2 PM — quietNov 9, 5 PM — quietNov 9, 8 PM — quietNov 9, 11 PM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 5 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 11 AM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 5 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 11 PM — quietToday, 2 AM — quietToday, 5 AM — quietToday, 8 AM — quietToday, 11 AM — quietToday, 2 PM — quietToday, 5 PM — quietToday, 8 PM — quiet 1
Nov 3Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9yesterdaynow · 10:08 PM ET
  1. 1

    Marc Elias declares victory for Elias Law Group and clients

    Election lawyer Marc Elias characterized the Court's denial as a complete defeat for the Trump DOJ and another victory for his law group and their clients.

    “A complete DEFEAT for Trump DOJ. Another victory for Elias Law Group and our clients.”
    — Marc Elias
    • marcelias.bsky.social

      🚨BREAKING: Supreme Court DENIES Department of Justice request for emergency stay in California election case. No noted dissents. The Court did not even ask for opposition briefs! A complete DEFEAT for Trump DOJ. Another victory for Elias Law Group and our clients.

      marcelias.bsky.socialBluesky9d ago11k▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 116 posts in this stretch
    • A government accustomed to commanding obedience may find judicial independence a most disagreeable invention.

      millydogood.bsky.socialBluesky9d ago29▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • ctrlaltresist.com

      No dissents. No response briefs even requested. SCOTUS treated DOJ's emergency election grab like junk mail and tossed it the night before Election Day. Some losses sting. This one humiliates.

      ctrlaltresist.comBluesky9d ago25▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. background

    Supreme Court denies DOJ emergency stay request in California election case — The Supreme Court rejected a Department of Justice request for an emergency stay in a California election case. The Court did not note any dissents and did not request opposition briefs from the opposing side.

What people are saying 21 voices from 1 site · best of 116 · verbatim