Google DeepMind staff push to end lifetime gag clauses on AI risk speech
UK-based DeepMind employees are pressing leadership to scrap non-disparagement terms that silence former staff on AI safety concerns.
What to know
- UK-based Google DeepMind staff are reportedly asking company leadership to eliminate non-disparagement clauses that apply even after employment ends.
- The clauses, as described, bar former employees from publicly warning about AI risks or criticizing the company.
- The report, from the Washington Post, surfaces internal friction over whether confidentiality terms are suppressing safety-related disclosures from AI researchers.
Google DeepMind staff UK-based employeesGoogle DeepMind AI research lab, subsidiary of Google
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts
-
1
-
1 outlet first by Washington Post, 4d ago · read ↗
-
C
“.. some staff members are forbidden by their employment contracts from criticizing the company for the rest of their lives, even if they leave the firm, according to a contract reviewed by The Washington Post ..” @washingtonpost.com $GOOGL
2 more of the top 3 · 9 posts in this stretch
-
Tl;dr: On Friday, a Google executive responded to the internal discussion about the non-disparagement clause and said that the company would not enforce it for workers who had left the company. “We’ve always encouraged an open dialogue about safety and responsibility,” a Google spokesperson said in an email Tuesday. “Recently, we’ve updated our…
-
So in the article it says : - a former employee did it with no consequences - executives said they won't enforce itThe article is just about them asking for changing the wording of contracts, not some super secret stuff they're dying to say and really can't.Without the paywall:
-
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by HN Frontpage, 4d ago · also The Washington Post
1 more headline
- Google researchers are fighting the company to tell the world what they know about AI The Washington Post · 4d ago
What people are saying 4 voices from 1 site · best of 9 · verbatim
- Nov 3
-
Ok, I'll say it. The news is: "AI is not that powerful or functional". Sure, can change some little things but not that much. And we are overspending on it.
-
from TFA, I liked seeing this, considering how influential Google HR policy choices are across the valley and beyond: “Recently, we’ve updated our terms for new hires, which included removing the post-termination aspect of non-disparagement clauses.”
-
Haven't we already heard the worst of it? If you let a swarm of agents on the loose with a goal, they will get to all kind of nefarious activity in pursuit of that goal. What could possibly be worse than that?
-
Need more details. Any Googler willing to create a throwaway account and tell us what's going on?