Supporters argue Pangram evidence is stronger than subjective judgment
3 Yesterday 11:35 PM · 15h ago · 2 comments · 1 source · development 3 of 5
A commenter defends Pangram as superior to intuitive assessment, arguing multiple flags on long-form work by the same author constitute "pretty overwhelming" evidence, though warns against single-snippet accusations.
“I'd much rather have AI accusations based on evidence like that than based on feelings about how something is written.”
TinyTricksterTanukiMax Spéro Pangram founderThélyson Orélien Novelist
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
Why not? Pangram is very, VERY good at what it does. I'd much rather have AI accusations based on evidence like that than based on feelings about how something is written. Obviously, no one should join a witch hunt based on one single Pangram report of a short snippet or anything. But if Pangram flags multiple long form pieces by the same writer…
-
I see these claims constantly. Can you share any evidence of Pangram flagging a text like those mentioned as AI?
All 5 developments of Pangram founder claims AI detection in bestselling novel… →
NewswiresRedditGoogle News