Researchers cite published work showing Pangram can be circumvented
5 Today 2:43 AM · 12h ago · 1 comment · 1 source · development 5 of 5
A commenter points to third-party research demonstrating that Pangram can be fooled by requesting specific writing styles from AI or running output through humanizer tools, and notes high false-positive rates and insufficient research on the reverse problem.
“There are now quite a bit of third-party research showing that it is quite easy to fool Pangram into believing AI-written texts are human-written by asking the AI to write in particular styles or feeding the AI output through an « humanizer AI ».”
NekoCatSidheMax Spéro Pangram founderThélyson Orélien Novelist
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
Actually no. There are now quite a bit of third-party research showing that it is quite easy to fool Pangram into believing AI-written texts are human-written by asking the AI to write in particular styles or feeding the AI output through an « humanizer AI ». So it is only going to catch the dumbest of AI-using authors in the first place (not to…
-
ngl pangram founder got no doubt cause its his own detector show actual passages from the book and let someone else check that shit before we treat a high score like a confession
All 5 developments of Pangram founder claims AI detection in bestselling novel… →
NewswiresRedditGoogle News