Users debate Pangram's technical capabilities and limitations
2 Yesterday 8:38 PM · 18h ago · 2 comments · 1 source · development 2 of 5
Reddit commenters contest the reliability of Pangram's detection. Some defend its effectiveness for long-form analysis, while others argue research shows it can be fooled through specific writing styles or AI humanizer tools, and note the lack of peer review on adversarial testing.
“Pangram doesn't rely on LLMs though. These are entirely different kinds of AI.”
Zonoro14Max Spéro Pangram founderThélyson Orélien Novelist
The whole story articlespostscomments the bright band is this development · numbered dots are the others · click one to jump
What people said 2 voices · verbatim
-
Pangram doesn't rely on LLMs though. These are entirely different kinds of AI. The task of "write indistinguishably from a human" and "detect whether a given text was written by an A unable to perfectly imitate human writing" have very little in common, and the latter task is vastly easier.
-
Suddenly readers are in favor of AI. What a day to be alive. Not a good day, but a day.
All 5 developments of Pangram founder claims AI detection in bestselling novel… →
NewswiresRedditGoogle News