Study: Starlink Satellites Leak Radio Noise Into Key Astronomy Frequencies
Curtin University researchers find SpaceX hardware emissions up to 10,000 times stronger than the ancient cosmic signals the SKA-Low telescope is built to detect.
What to know
- Curtin University measured 112,534 unintended radio emissions from 1,806 Starlink satellites in the 73–235 MHz band SKA-Low needs to detect signals from the cosmic dawn.
- The leakage is accidental hardware noise, not scheduled transmissions, and current ITU rules do not clearly cover unintended emissions even inside protected astronomy bands.
- SpaceX has previously made engineering changes for optical brightness and coordinated on higher-frequency bands, but has not yet addressed this low-frequency hardware leakage.
- Algorithmic mitigation is described as still in early ('embryonic') stages, leaving engineering fixes to satellite hardware as the main proposed solution.
Steven Tingay Curtin University researcherSpaceX / Starlink Satellite constellation operatorInternational Telecommunication Union (ITU) Global spectrum regulatorSKA-Low / Curtin University team Radio astronomy project and researchers
How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage articlesposts
-
background
SpaceX said to be open to dialogue after researchers share findings — According to the report, SpaceX has previously addressed optical brightness with satellite visors and coordinated with NSF on higher-frequency bands, and is reportedly open to discussing future hardware changes, though algorithmic mitigation is described by scientists as still "embryonic."
-
background
Researchers flag a regulatory gray zone for unintended emissions — The ITU protects certain radio astronomy bands from intentional transmissions, but unintended electromagnetic leakage from satellite hardware falls largely outside that framework even when it lands inside protected spectrum.
-
background
Curtin University publishes Starlink leakage study in Astronomy & Astrophysics — Using the Engineering Development Array 2, a prototype SKA-Low station in Australia, researchers analyzed about 76 million radio images over 29 days and catalogued 112,534 emissions from 1,806 unique Starlink satellites across 73–235 MHz, the band SKA-Low needs for cosmic-dawn hydrogen signals.
-
1
Story spreads across Hacker News and social platforms
The Gadget Review report was posted to Hacker News and picked up by Mastodon-linked feeds, drawing dozens of comments as the piece circulated.
“Comparable to the brightest natural radio sources in the sky.”
— Steven Tingay, Curtin University researcher · source -
C
Astronomers spent decades designing the Square Kilometre Array Low (SKA-Low) to hear the faintest whisper in the observable universe — neutral hydrogen signals from the cosmic dawn, when the first stars flickered on roughly 13 billion years ago. What they’re picking up instead is electronic leakage from SpaceX satellites. -- Not the broadband…
2 more of the top 3 · 28 posts in this stretch
-
There is some evidence that little engineering effort has been put into mitigating this problem. I think if someone actually tried really hard we could make these birds a lot quieter.> We compared the detected power flux densities of this UEMR to that emitted by the first generation v1.0 and v1.5 Starlink satellites. When correcting for the…
-
I'm sorry what? "ULA couldn't design their rockets properly" They can design their rockets properly. It's Space X that cannot even get into orbit. Starship has had 10 years to get working and your complaining about Starliner? At least Starliner has a purpose and a destination. Holye shit you definitely have cognitive dissonance....... "designing…
-
What people are saying 21 voices from 3 sites · best of 28 · verbatim
- Sep 13
-
Gadget Review: " Starlink’s Signal Leakage Is Threatening Radio Astronomy’s Most Critical Frequencies " "Curtin University study finds SpaceX hardware leakage up to 10,000 times stronger than the cosmic signals SKA-Low must detect" https://www. gadgetreview.com/starlinks-sig nal-leakage-is-threatening-radio-astronomys-most-critical-frequencies…
-
As an astronomer, I am used to people on Reddit claiming these sorts of things without realizing that building telescopes to operate in vacuum without maintenance is hard.
- Sep 12
-
SpaceX isn’t going to reverse course. Starlinks are designed to stay about 5 years in orbit (yes, SpaceX needs to constantly launch new ones). SpaceX is also essentially synonymous with Elon. If he loses interest or gets hit by a bus tomorrow, SpaceX is gone, and in a few years so are Starlinks. So I would be cautious about this "reverse course" ;)
-
And who's going to pay for them? Biggest ground-based telescope nearing completion has 39m mirror and costed around $1.5bln. Biggest space telescope has 6.5m mirror and costed $10bln. That's essentially 100x cost difference.
-
Doing it "in space"/"on the Moon" costs roughly 100-1000x more and we can't even build anything nearly as big. And astronomy funding is already very limited. "Stop doing it on Earth" basically means "stop doing it".
-
All astronomical observations should be moved to space and away from Earth's orbit, at least as far as dark side of the moon if not further.
-
Once starship is running, spacex should launch a lunar crater telescope https://www.nasa.gov/general/lunar-crater-radio-telescope-lc... to permanently shut up this kind of grievances.
-
The SKA is trying to detect signals weaker than anything we've ever measured, and Starlink is essentially shouting next to it. 10,000x over the limit isn't a calibration issue that's a fundamental conflict between two things that can't coexist in the same sky.
-
"their industries" That is zero incentive. Space X would have to keep adding value to the space program and push forward. So far they are not pusing anything.
-
Not to mention 13 em-dashes in a 500 word post. At this point you may as well ask Claude yourself about news and cut out the middleman. That'll also cut into their attempts to manipulate your opinion.
-
C
Starlink’s Signal Leakage Is Threatening Radio Astronomy’s Most Critical Frequencies # space # spacex # starlink https://www. gadgetreview.com/starlinks-sig nal-leakage-is-threatening-radio-astronomys-most-critical-frequencies
-
Did you care about the writing style of Rex Edison before and now you are disappointed?That page is not the New Yorker.And don't get me wrong, but the writing of normal newspaper became shit through the internet not due to claude. You have the clickbait header, than you have the subtext which repeats the clickbait header, then you had the first…
-
Another example of billionaire wait trillionaire power capture. It’s really tough for democracy when one man has all that power. Hah Elon is lex luthor.
-
I realize this is off topic, but why do people use Claude of all models to write these, when its style is so obvious and so grating? I just immediately hit Back on the first Claudism.
-
Or we could just not pollute the earth and instead invest in long term upgradable and repairable infrastructure instead?
-
And then figure out how to maintain a complex array like SKA-Low, but on the dark side of the moon? Meteorites, regolith, lack of atmosphere & magnetic field… not impossible, but sounds like a real nightmare.
-
All the more incentive to establish a permanent lunar presence. We can use the dark side of the moon as essentially a radiation shield to block the RF pollution from earth. Would offer a much lower background radiation than anywhere earthside
- Sep 11
-
While I pine for a dark sky, it makes sense that these operations should move in the same way century old optical telescopes in cities are no longer used for cutting edge science.The far side of the moon seems like an increasingly viable option.
-
> Algorithmic mitigation is being explored, but scientists describe it as “embryonic” — potentially demanding computing power that rivals the science processing itself.It sounds like this would work? Just be more costly, at least in the short term.> Engineering fixes are the real answerWhat is the fix and tradeoff? The article doesn't seem to…
-
I just have to say: I _hate_ with a white-hot fury the growing usage of html-load and error-report dot com bullshit on these sites. I block those domains for gratuitous ad-serving, and sites just cycle a modal error now.(I know, I could disable JavaScript everywhere and enable it on a site-by-site basis. Maybe that time has come.)
-
That’s a mighty nice field of study you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it