conv.

All stories
HealthQuiet 4d · day 5

University of Alberta nanoparticle study reverses Alzheimer's in mice

A 30-year Alzheimer's researcher says a new nanoparticle treatment reversed disease markers in mice, sparking a viral wave of hope, grief and animal-testing debate online.

What to know

  • Mice with Alzheimer's treated with nanoparticles showed reversal of disease markers at the molecular and cellular level plus improved symptoms, per University of Alberta researchers.
  • The lead researcher, after 30 years studying Alzheimer's, called the results the most exciting of their career.
  • The nanoparticles used (PLGA) are biodegradable and already used to deliver about 20 drugs in humans, according to commenters citing the article.
  • The finding is still an animal study; whether it translates to effective human treatment, and whether it would be accessible or affordable, remains unresolved and contested online.

The dispute Whether using mice to develop the treatment is ethically justified given the potential human benefit, versus the view that such testing is inherently cruel and unjustifiable. · positions read across 48 posts and comments

most voices

The study is genuinely hopeful given personal experience with dementia's toll on families, and research should be accelerated.

  • “It's too late for my family. Our lives have been decimated since 2015 caring for parents with dementia slowly consuming their minds. It's a long term illness of family torture.”

    andreastudiescovid.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

Testing on mice is unethical (speciesism) regardless of potential human benefit.

  • “Animal experimentation is unethical and unacceptable regardless of human benefit. Speciesism = racism = sexism.”

    wrennreed.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

Animal results rarely translate to humans, and any treatment likely won't be affordable or approved anyway.

  • “If only animal studies didn't create hope, for them only to be dashed because humans aren't mice, rats, monkeys etc.”

    colbobs.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

University of Alberta researchers Study authors

University of Alberta nanoparticle study reverses Alzheimer's in mice
ctvnews.ca

How it unfolded 5 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump postscomments

Peak 13 pieces in two hours at Sep 19, 6 AM; 49 pieces over 5 days (2 posts · 47 comments) Sep 18, 6 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Mastodon 1Sep 18, 8 PM — 1 piece · 1 post — Bluesky 1Sep 18, 10 PM — 6 pieces · 6 comments — Bluesky 6Sep 19, 12 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 19, 2 AM — 7 pieces · 7 comments — Bluesky 7Sep 19, 4 AM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 19, 6 AM — 13 pieces · 13 comments — Bluesky 13Sep 19, 8 AM — 9 pieces · 9 comments — Bluesky 9Sep 19, 10 AM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Sep 19, 12 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Sep 19, 2 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 19, 4 PM — quietSep 19, 6 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Sep 19, 8 PM — quietSep 19, 10 PM — quietSep 20, 12 AM — quietSep 20, 2 AM — quietSep 20, 4 AM — quietSep 20, 6 AM — quietSep 20, 8 AM — quietSep 20, 10 AM — quietSep 20, 12 PM — quietSep 20, 2 PM — quietSep 20, 4 PM — quietSep 20, 6 PM — quietSep 20, 8 PM — quietSep 20, 10 PM — quietSep 21, 12 AM — quietSep 21, 2 AM — quietSep 21, 4 AM — quietSep 21, 6 AM — quietSep 21, 8 AM — quietSep 21, 10 AM — quietSep 21, 12 PM — quietSep 21, 2 PM — quietSep 21, 4 PM — quietSep 21, 6 PM — quietSep 21, 8 PM — quietSep 21, 10 PM — quietSep 22, 12 AM — quietSep 22, 2 AM — quietSep 22, 4 AM — quietSep 22, 6 AM — quietSep 22, 8 AM — quietSep 22, 10 AM — quietSep 22, 12 PM — quietSep 22, 2 PM — quietSep 22, 4 PM — quietSep 22, 6 PM — quietSep 22, 8 PM — quietSep 22, 10 PM — quietYesterday, 12 AM — quietYesterday, 2 AM — quietYesterday, 4 AM — quietYesterday, 6 AM — quietYesterday, 8 AM — quietYesterday, 10 AM — quietYesterday, 12 PM — quietYesterday, 2 PM — quietYesterday, 4 PM — quietYesterday, 6 PM — quietYesterday, 8 PM — quietYesterday, 10 PM — quietToday, 12 AM — quietToday, 2 AM — quiet 1–45
Sep 19Sep 20Sep 21Sep 22yesterdaynow · 3:48 AM ET
  1. 5

    Others question access, affordability and political will

    Some commenters expressed doubt that any resulting treatment would be affordable or approved, particularly in the United States, contrasting it with Canada's universal healthcare system.

    “please carry on I helped my wife for 4 years as I saw her disappear in front of me Alzheimer's is worse than cancer at least with cancer you have an end date…”
    — heidinjoe.bsky.social, Bluesky commenter · source
    • If it's a choice between a parent or a mouse, most people will choose to save their parent. It's unfortunate that you'd choose the mouse.

      cautiousoptimistic.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago12▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 39 posts in this stretch
    • This is huge. 30 years of work and finally seeing reversal at the cellular level - hope this translates to human trials soon.

      farismoonknight.bsky.socialBluesky4d ago11▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • please carry on I helped my wife for 4 years as I saw her disappear in front of me Alzheimer's is worse than cancer at least with cancer you have an end date with Alzheimer's your mind is dead and you know it but they make you keep on suffering

      heidinjoe.bsky.socialBluesky4d ago6▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  2. 4

    Caregivers share personal loss, urge faster research

    Commenters who cared for or lost family members to dementia responded with grief and calls to accelerate the research, some volunteering for future trials.

    “It's too late for my family. Our lives have been decimated since 2015 caring for parents with dementia slowly consuming their minds.”
    — andreastudiescovid.bsky.social
    • Good. Speed it up! It's too late for my family. Our lives have been decimated since 2015 caring for parents with dementia slowly consuming their minds. It's a long term illness of family torture.

      andreastudiescovid.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago22▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 3 posts in this stretch
    • No, it's animal cruelty. Most meds tested on animals don't work & u all go so above and beyond with ur human supremacy (based on looks) & u think the mice are so different they don't deserve to be treated like you and cruelly tested on, but so similar you think the meds will work on both of you 😑 🤢

      foodnotfri3nds.bsky.socialBluesky5d agoview on Bluesky ↗
    • No, most meds tested on animals don't work and you all go so above and beyond with your human supremacy (based on looks) & you think the mice are so different they don't deserve to be treated like you and cruelly tested on, but so similar you think the meds will work on both of you 😑 🤢

      foodnotfri3nds.bsky.socialBluesky5d agoview on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  3. 3

    Animal-rights commenters condemn the mouse testing

    Several commenters argued that using mice for the experiments is unethical regardless of potential human benefit, drawing pushback from others who cited animal testing behind existing vaccines and medicines.

    “Animal experimentation is unethical and unacceptable regardless of human benefit.”
    — wrennreed.bsky.social
    • Come do research in Canada, we believe in science and fund it.

      vinniefelice.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago18▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 5 posts in this stretch
    • Rfk would read this and take away that we should eat the mice

      chadg72.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago13▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • I pray that it works! I lost both parents to this disease!

      susieqoualum.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago9▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →
  4. 2

    Study goes viral on Bluesky, drawing thousands of reactions

    A Bluesky post summarizing the CTV News article spread widely, accumulating over 3,600 engagement points and dozens of comments within a day.

    “I've been working on Alzheimer's for 30 years and I've never been so excited.”
    — Lead researcher, University of Alberta, Alzheimer's researcher · source
    • drianweissman.bsky.social

      A new study found that mice with Alzheimer’s that were treated with nanoparticles showed reversal of the disease at the molecular and cellular level, as well as improved symptoms. “I’ve been working on Alzheimer’s for 30 years and I’ve never been so excited.”

      drianweissman.bsky.socialBluesky5d ago3.6k▲view on Bluesky ↗
  5. 1

    U of A study finds nanoparticles reverse Alzheimer's in mice

    CTV News reports on a University of Alberta study in which mice with Alzheimer's disease treated with nanoparticles showed reversal of the disease at the molecular and cellular level as well as improved symptoms.

What people are saying 15 voices from 1 site · best of 48 · verbatim

Still unanswered
  • Will the nanoparticle treatment actually work in human trials, given past failures of animal-to-human translation?
  • Will the resulting treatment be affordable or accessible, particularly for patients without universal healthcare?