conv.

All stories
PoliticsActive · 13h

Judge Kelly rejects Trump's national security argument in case

A federal judge concluded there is no valid national security justification for the Trump administration's legal position.

What to know

  • Federal Judge Kelly ruled that the Trump administration has no valid national security justification for its legal position in the case.
  • The ruling rejects what the administration framed as a national security matter, undermining a key legal argument.
  • Online commenters characterize the decision as validation that the administration was overreaching with national security claims.

The dispute Whether this ruling signals genuine judicial independence or merely delays inevitable appeals to more sympathetic (Trump-appointed) judges. · positions read across 172 posts and comments

most voices

Judge Kelly's ruling is correct—Trump weaponizes national security claims for personal and political purposes.

  • “The only national security threat in this case is Donald Trump…”

    goldcamp3579.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

While the judge's ruling is good, it reveals ongoing judicial and institutional vulnerabilities to Trump's challenges.

  • “He's a trump appointed judge but at least he didn't cave to this OBVIOUS BS bait. Nice to see integrity remains in the courts.”

    ministeroftruth72.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
some voices

The Trump administration is wasting taxpayer money on frivolous litigation and should be held accountable.

  • “People really need to think about the hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars that have been spent in litigation by the Trump administration!!”

    catjoe.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗

Judge Kelly Federal judgeTrump administration Defendant/moving party

How it unfolded 1 development · click the chart to see its coverage postscomments

Peak 24 pieces in one half hour at Yesterday, 4 PM; 172 pieces over 14 hours (1 post · 171 comments) Yesterday, 12:59 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Yesterday, 1:29 PM — quietYesterday, 1:59 PM — quietYesterday, 2:29 PM — quietYesterday, 2:59 PM — quietYesterday, 3:29 PM — 11 pieces · 1 post · 10 comments — Bluesky 11Yesterday, 3:59 PM — 20 pieces · 20 comments — Bluesky 20Yesterday, 4:29 PM — 16 pieces · 16 comments — Bluesky 16Yesterday, 4:59 PM — 24 pieces · 24 comments — Bluesky 24Yesterday, 5:29 PM — 21 pieces · 21 comments — Bluesky 21Yesterday, 5:59 PM — 16 pieces · 16 comments — Bluesky 16Yesterday, 6:29 PM — 18 pieces · 18 comments — Bluesky 18Yesterday, 6:59 PM — 10 pieces · 10 comments — Bluesky 10Yesterday, 7:29 PM — 10 pieces · 10 comments — Bluesky 10Yesterday, 7:59 PM — 7 pieces · 7 comments — Bluesky 7Yesterday, 8:29 PM — 7 pieces · 7 comments — Bluesky 7Yesterday, 8:59 PM — 4 pieces · 4 comments — Bluesky 4Yesterday, 9:29 PM — 2 pieces · 2 comments — Bluesky 2Yesterday, 9:59 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Yesterday, 10:29 PM — 3 pieces · 3 comments — Bluesky 3Yesterday, 10:59 PM — quietYesterday, 11:29 PM — 1 piece · 1 comment — Bluesky 1Yesterday, 11:59 PM — quietToday, 12:29 AM — quietToday, 12:59 AM — quietToday, 1:29 AM — quietToday, 1:59 AM — quietToday, 2:29 AM — quiet 1
4 PM8 PMtodaynow · 2:59 AM ET
  1. 1
    “BREAKING: Judge Kelly just concluded there's no "national security" argument in this case…”
    — muellershewrote.com · source
    • muellershewrote.com

      BREAKING: Judge Kelly just concluded there's no "national security" argument in this case (CNN/MSNOW/Politico)

      muellershewrote.comBluesky11h ago15k▲view on Bluesky ↗
    2 more of the top 3 · 172 posts in this stretch
    • 💙🐈‍⬛🐈🐈‍⬛💙 People really need to think about the hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars that have been spent in litigation by the Trump administration!!

      catjoe.bsky.socialBluesky11h ago865▲view on Bluesky ↗
    • The only national security threat in this case is Donald Trump…

      goldcamp3579.bsky.socialBluesky11h ago262▲view on Bluesky ↗
    all of them →

What people are saying 21 voices from 1 site · best of 172 · verbatim