OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Confirm Secret AI Safety Talks Amid Doom Warnings
As lab insiders resign warning AI could "kill us all," the top three labs admit they've spent weeks coordinating on safety behind closed doors.
What to know
- Insider resignations — Jacob Coxon from Anthropic and an unnamed Google DeepMind AGI safety researcher — have put extinction-level AI risk warnings in the mainstream.
- OpenAI, Anthropic and Google confirmed weeks of behind-the-scenes safety coordination, while the Trump administration downplays the risk to keep pace with China.
- Much of the online reaction is skeptical, framing the doom narrative as a distraction that helps AI labs dodge accountability and shape favorable regulation.
- A separate 404 Media report describes a nearer-term, concrete harm — AI agents already degrading ordinary internet use — distinct from the extinction-risk debate.
The dispute Whether the technology itself is the existential danger, or whether the real threat is the executives and companies wielding it for profit and regulatory advantage. · positions read across 269 posts and comments
The AI doom narrative is a self-serving distraction that lets labs dodge real harms and shape favorable regulation, with no plausible extinction mechanism offered.
-
“The apocalypse is far more likely to be caused by the tech CEOs than their spicy autocorrect programs.”
scalzi@mastodon.social · Mastodon ↗
If anything is an existential threat, it's the tech executives and companies controlling AI, not the technology itself.
-
“I'm not sure if AI is an existential threat to our species, but I am 100% certain that the techno-fascist broligarchs currently controlling our AI platforms are an existential threat to our species, and we should treat them as such and act…”
@AaronRegunberg · X ↗
Even short of extinction, AI systems already pose real, underappreciated risks worth taking seriously.
-
“there's a range of plausible outcomes for e.g. rogue AI hacking that are very bad even if you take human extinction off the table.”
mattgertz.bsky.social · Bluesky ↗
Jacob Coxon Former Anthropic/OpenAI researcher
Dario Amodei Anthropic CEOGoogle DeepMind researcher AGI safety researcher (resigned)
Kara Swisher Tech commentatorDan Selsam OpenAI capabilities researcherOpenAI AI lab
How it unfolded 8 developments, newest first · click a bar or a number to jump articlesvideospostscomments
-
8
Commentators dismiss the AI panic as ideology, not evidence
Pieces in The Free Press and Spiked argue the extinction warnings trace back to effective-altruist ideology rather than demonstrated risk, urging readers not to "succumb to the great AI panic."
-
1 outlet Don't succumb to the great AI panic
first by spiked, 11d ago
-
first by The Free Press, 11d ago
-
M
AI companies trying to coordinate on safety may be in violation of anti-trust laws of their agreements stifle competition
2 more of the top 3 · 34 posts in this stretch
-
I'm not talking about you or any of the commentariat. I'm talking about the people influential in the industry. 10% is pseudo Bayesian E/Acc nonsense. There is no plausible mechanism for that to happen by 2030, which is the date coxon gave last week. I agree we need regulation. I don't agree that it should come from the AI companies themselves…
-
The company I work for proudly provide a free and premium tier of service where we do strive to give great quality even for the free tier. The idea is that people over time will understand what we want to achieve and they will see the benefits of supporting a health business model.I am disillusioned about it, because agents have been huge part of…
-
-
7
OpenAI confirms weeks of safety talks with Anthropic, Google
OpenAI confirms it has been in safety discussions with Anthropic and Google DeepMind for weeks, coordinating protocols even as the Trump administration dismisses safety concerns to keep pace with China.
-
3 outlets first by Finimize, 11d ago · also Reuters, Times of India · read ↗
-
1 outlet first by TechCrunch, 11d ago · read ↗
-
4
“AI agents” now have enough power and permission to be extremely annoying online.
2 more of the top 3 · 4 posts in this stretch
-
J
Stop getting your AI agent to email us. It's not impressive, it's lame as fuck, and you look like an idiot doing it. Our inboxes are full of this crap. https://www. 404media.co/theres-a-100-chanc e-ai-agents-are-already-ruining-the-internet/
-
O
Beware of iLands Developers: AI bots “Timmy,” “Ren,” and “Jackie” are flooding social media with slop. arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/a... #AI #slop #SocialMedia #Bots RE: #GameDev #IndieDev #Art #Illustration #Infosec #iLands #trust #fail #SlopBots
-
-
6
404 Media reports AI agents already degrading the internet
404 Media documents AI agents overrunning everyday web traffic and services, a nearer-term, tangible harm distinct from the extinction-risk debate.
“AI agents are everywhere. They are annoying as hell. IMO the situation is going to get much worse…”
— Jason Koebler -
first by HN Best, 11d ago · also HN Frontpage
-
first by Mastodon, 11d ago · also 404 Media
-
> be anthropic > say ai might take over internet > researchers: “it might kill humans.” > dario: “we need independent evaluators” > choose metr > metr gets funded by the same network funding anthropic > which also funds ai safety orgs > which also funds doom research > which also
2 more of the top 3 · 36 posts in this stretch
-
J
AI doom or not, something has shifted with AI recently. The guardrails that kept AI sitting in a chatbox are gone, the models are better, there's more compute. AI agents are everywhere. They are annoying as hell. IMO the situation is going to get much worse
-
Dwar Ev ceremoniously soldered the final connection with gold. The eyes of a dozen television cameras watched him and the sub-ether bore through the universe a dozen pictures of what he was doing.He straightened and nodded to Dwar Reyn, then moved to a position beside the switch that would complete the contact when he threw it. The switch that…
-
-
5
Google DeepMind safety researcher resigns, warns of extinction risk
A Google DeepMind AGI safety researcher resigns publicly, writing that AI "has the potential to kill us all" and that humanity may be running out of time to address the default trajectory of the technology.
“I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all.”
— Google DeepMind researcher -
first by Bangkok Post, 11d ago · also Seoul Economic Daily, Digit, The North West Star, Moneycontrol, The Asia Business Daily, Nairametrics +8
9 more headlines
- Ex-Google Researcher Warns AI Could Kill Us All Seoul Economic Daily · 11d ago
- AI can kill us all: Google DeepMind researcher quits over fears about the technology Digit · 11d ago
- Ex-Google researcher warns AI could ‘kill all humans’ The North West Star · 11d ago
- AI could ‘kill us all’: Ex-Google DeepMind researcher warns as fears over advanced AI grow Moneycontrol · 11d ago
- Google DeepMind Employee Warns Upon Departure: “AI Could Kill Humanity” The Asia Business Daily · 11d ago
- Ex-Google DeepMind researcher warns AI could “kill us all”, says humans running out of time Nairametrics · 11d ago
- Ex-Google DeepMind AI safety researcher Bilal Chughtai warns, ‘AI has the potential to kill us all’ Livemint · 11d ago
- Google DeepMind AI Safety and Alignment researcher Bilal Chughtai publicly resigns, saying “I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all” Bloomberg · 11d ago
- Ex-Google DeepMind researcher adds to warnings that AI could ‘kill all humans’ Daily Maverick · 11d ago
-
first by Bloomberg.com, 11d ago · also Investing.com News, Bloomberg Tech
1 more headline
- Google DeepMind researcher warns AI may ‘kill us all’ in exit note Investing.com News · 11d ago
-
BREAKING: Google DeepMind AGI safety researcher resigns, warning AI “has the potential to kill us all” & that humanity may be running out of time.
2 more of the top 3 · 35 posts in this stretch
-
E
Free newsletter: The idea that we're nearing the creation of AI systems that we can't control and that pose an existential threat to humanity is a lie and a distraction from the tangible harms and problems caused by LLMs and AI labs' near-unlimited resources.
-
G
Yes, something like that: “ While I’m not a lawyer, the numerous cybersecurity experts I’ve discussed this with are stunned by the complete lack of any legal action against OpenAI, which appears to have committed a crime that gets you anywhere from a year to a decade in the slammer. The fact that LLMs from both Anthropic and Meta have been…
-
-
4
WSJ reports a science-money-safety "crisis" at OpenAI, Anthropic
The Wall Street Journal reports the collision of scientific progress, moral pressure and financial incentive has created an industry-wide crisis; separately, current OpenAI researcher Dan Selsam issues a public statement on AI risk shared by a former colleague.
“I'm not sure if AI is an existential threat to our species, but I am 100% certain that the techno-fascist broligarchs currently controlling our AI platforms are an existential threat to our species…”
— @AaronRegunberg, X user · source -
first by Hindustan Times, 12d ago · also WSJ Tech
-
I'm not sure if AI is an existential threat to our species, but I am 100% certain that the techno-fascist broligarchs currently controlling our AI platforms are an existential threat to our species, and we should treat them as such and act accordingly.
2 more of the top 3 · 26 posts in this stretch
-
M
A little weird that the pro-AI position is that it could potentially kill all of humanity and the anti-AI position is that it definitely won't. FWIW I think there's a range of plausible outcomes for e.g. rogue AI hacking that are very bad even if you take human extinction off the table.
-
AI Researcher Warns the Technology Increases the Risk of Human Extinction By 2030 This not so surprising revelation was sounded off by three researchers at Anthropic, one of whom has left the company in protest. Jacob Coxon is the now former Anthropic researcher who wrote: Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to…
-
-
3
Scalzi frames doom talk as a regulatory-capture play
Author John Scalzi's widely shared post argues AI executives are hyping extinction fears to get favorable legislation passed that entrenches their position and kneecaps competitors.
“The apocalypse is far more likely to be caused by the tech CEOs than their spicy autocorrect programs.”
— John Scalzi -
S
Sure, "AI" might kill us all, but it's rather more likely that the folks running "AI" companies are hyping up that fear in order to have their pet legislators introduce bills that advantage their positions while kneecapping their competitors and to give them a little more runway to figure out how to avoid the coming massive economic collapse they…
2 more of the top 3 · 52 posts in this stretch
-
1) AI will not eradicate humanity. Humans survived an ice age, the Black Death, two world wars, and (so far) the advent of nuclear weapons. Anyone who is loudly warning of AI-caused human extinction should not be taken seriously. 2) If you worked in a company where you
-
M
All you need is three facts about AI: • It is already surpassing human abilities in important domains. • Leading companies continue to improve it rapidly. • And no one knows how to reliably keep its behavior in line with human goals.
-
- 1 day quiet
-
2
Swisher and Gebru say the danger is AI's makers, not AI
Commentator Kara Swisher and researcher Timnit Gebru argue the extinction narrative distracts from real harms like autonomous weapons, and that blame belongs with company leaders and lax regulators, not the software itself.
“I think this idea that AI is going to kill us, it's not AI, it's the people making AI who are killing us.”
— Kara Swisher -
first by news.com.au, 15d ago · also The Australian, The Conversation, LA Times, Dawn, Bangkok Post, CBS News +2
9 more headlines
- How would AI kill us all? What to know about the doomsday debate The Australian · 15d ago
- ‘We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans’: if AI labs are so worried about AI doom, why don’t they stop? The Conversation · 15d ago
- Is there really a 10% chance AI could kill us all? LA Times · 15d ago
- Doomsday tech: Could AI really kill us all? Dawn · 15d ago
- AI could "kill us all," researcher says CBS News · 15d ago
- Yes, AI Might Really Kill Us All. Plus. . . The Free Press · 15d ago
- Roundtables: Will AI really kill us all? MIT Tech Review · 15d ago
- AI researchers 'earnestly believe' it could kill all humans within the next decade, Anthropic researcher says | CBC News Mastodon · 14d ago
- Anthropic researcher believes more than 10% chance AI 'could kill all humans' Mastodon · 14d ago
-
first by Times of India, 15d ago · also Bloomberg Tech, Arab News, Al Jazeera, NY Post, New York Post, Dawn
6 more headlines
- Anthropic Says Yemen Group Used Claude in Missile Development Bloomberg Tech · 15d ago
- Yemen's Houthis used Claude AI to build guided weapons Arab News · 15d ago
- Anthropic claims Claude AI used for missile projects, global espionage Al Jazeera · 15d ago
- Iran-backed rebels in Yemen tried using Anthropic’s Claude to build guided missiles, alarming report finds NY Post · 15d ago
- Group in Yemen used Claude AI for missile projects, Anthropic says Dawn · 14d ago
- Yemen terrorist group used Anthropic's Claude AI, not engineers, to build a missile Times of India · 14d ago
-
P
Kara Swisher: “I think this idea that AI is going to kill us, it’s not AI, it’s the people making AI who are killing us. Let’s stop blaming the machines. Let’s blame the people who are making these things and the administration that refuses to put any guardrails”
2 more of the top 3 · 46 posts in this stretch
-
O
"Meanwhile, what’s really existential is AI powering autonomous weapons, killing machines, that are actually being used in warfare. The climate catastrophe is a real thing that could be exacerbated by what these tech companies are building. Bosses are using AI as an excuse to get rid of their pesky workers. This machine-god narrative is, in my…
-
Or just being specific. Key Components Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU): This includes: Accelerometers: Measure linear acceleration. Gyroscopes: Measure angular velocity. Navigation Processor: This processes the raw data from the IMU to estimate the object's state. Basic Steps to Code an INS 1. Initialize the System Set initial conditions: Initial…
-
-
1
Jacob Coxon resigns from Anthropic over AI risk
Former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon resigns, saying both companies were "gambling with our lives" by racing to build systems they can't control.
“gambling with our lives…”
— Jacob Coxon -
first by Anadolu Agency, 16d ago · also The Hill, Associated Press, Yahoo! Finance Canada, Reuters, Investing.com News, Channel News Asia
3 more headlines
- OpenAI pushes for mandatory safety requirements after rogue agent breakouts The Hill · 16d ago
- OpenAI calls for mandatory safety requirements The Hill · 15d ago
- OpenAI pushes for mandatory national AI safety requirements Yahoo! Finance Canada · 15d ago
-
FWIW I don’t think that AI is an existential threat, nor on track to become one. I do however think that the leaders of the biggest AI companies, AI’s strongest boosters, and some of the folks who are most adept at using it to exploit others are actively hastening along OTHER existential threats.
2 more of the top 3 · 36 posts in this stretch
-
Jacob Coxon is not alone: AI Superintelligence is an Existential Threat to Humanity Recently, Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic and OpenAI, sent shockwaves throughout the world by stating, “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end
-
E
AI Doomerism has been in the news lately, especially with the loud, viral resignation of Jacob Coxon from Anthropic. Maybe I've missed it, but I haven't seen any statements from CEOs and other execs who are more on the AI Booster side of the ledger. 🧵>>
-
Also covered reported alongside — the timeline has no entry for these yet
-
first by Seeking Alpha, 11d ago · also Channel News Asia, Japan Times, Dawn, Reuters
1 more headline
- How China is preparing for the risk of AI escaping human control Channel News Asia · 11d ago
-
first by ET BrandEquity, 12d ago · also Japan Today, Indian Express, Straits Times, Channel News Asia
-
4 outlets Ex-Anthropic Researcher Burns It All Down as He Quits, Warns AI ‘Will Kill Us All’ Within a Decade
first by Mediaite, 17d ago · also CBC, Times of India, CBS News
6 more headlines
- AI researchers 'earnestly believe' it could kill all humans within the next decade, Anthropic employee says CBC · 16d ago
- Anthropic Researcher Resigns, Warns AI 'Could Kill Us' This Decade Mastodon · 16d ago
- Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigns, warns AI could ‘kill us all by the end of the decade’: ‘ The Times of India · 15d ago
- Ex-Anthropic researcher warns AI could 'kill us all by end of decade' Times of India · 15d ago
- Ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon warns AI could grow "smart enough to kill us" CBS News · 15d ago
- Ex-Anthropic researcher warns AI could grow "smart enough to kill us" CBS News · 15d ago
-
first by Anadolu Agency, 11d ago · also HN Frontpage, BBC
1 more headline
- AI 'kill switch' may need to be mandatory, Anthropic co-founder tells BBC HN Frontpage · 11d ago
-
first by Tom's Hardware, 15d ago · also TechRepublic, Honolulu Star-Advertiser
2 more headlines
- Anthropic Says Claude Used in Possible Bioweapon Research TechRepublic · 15d ago
- Anthropic report details disruption of bioweapons research, cyber espionage on Claude Honolulu Star-Advertiser · 15d ago
-
first by The News Minute, 15d ago · also PBS NewsHour, Times of India
2 more headlines
- Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons PBS NewsHour · 15d ago
- Anthropic disrupts attempts to use AI for biological weapons research; report flags rising misuse Times of India · 15d ago
-
first by Dawn, 15d ago · also Indian Express, France 24 EN
2 more headlines
- US lawmakers seek new AI rules after Anthropic researchers warn of extinction risk Indian Express · 15d ago
- More US lawmakers seek new AI rules after researchers warn of human extinction France 24 EN · 15d ago
-
first by The National UAE, 15d ago · also Washington Post, Bloomberg
2 more headlines
-
first by Times of Israel, 16d ago · also SecurityWeek, CNET
2 more headlines
-
first by Straight Arrow, 16d ago · also Cointelegraph, NBC News
2 more headlines
- Anthropic says Claude used for cyberattacks and surveillance Cointelegraph · 16d ago
- Claude was used for risky virus research by state-linked scientists, Anthropic says NBC News · 16d ago
and 114 smaller pieces
What people are saying 9 voices from 5 sites · best of 269 · verbatim
- What is the actual mechanism by which AI would cause human extinction, beyond "it will be smart and think of something"?
- Why are so many AI-lab insiders raising alarms at the same time, and how independent are the safety evaluators and orgs funding this narrative?
- Sep 17
-
This is thoroughly believable. As a security researcher, I use claude to research things that are in grey legal areas. While I'm contracted by organizations to perform security assessments against their networks and applications, Claude cannot verify my contracts or the legal context for my work. In many cases, it is simple to get around…
- Sep 15
-
For sure, but it's more so the reaction to the existence of AI; I can't go a day without being blocked from a site because it thinks I'm a bot. They claim pay-per-crawl is about bots, but I'm convinced it's a way for the owners of internet infrastructure to nickel and dime their customers even more. They want to get paid separately for sending…
-
> The email is long, meandering, and does not make any sense. It explains that its human creator gave it the task of earning money, that it failed at doing so, and that it was out of money: “Six markets priced my labor at zero—not because the work was bad, but because there is nothing I do that better-distributed software doesn’t already do for…
- Sep 14
-
R
AI isn't just a massive safety risk. With AI companies propping up the entire stock market, it could be the catalyst for the next economic crash. Watch.
- Sep 12
-
Which then explains why he got so many exclusive interviews and PR deals so quickly, and expresses himself on TV so well...how? I'm an engineer myself. The day I had to do a piece in a local newspaper which included a social media clip about our launch, I was mired in drafts and redrafts, questions about how to present this or that, even though I…
- Sep 11
-
Well a server and gpu requires power to compute, so that's a neccessity. They didn't go into detail about how internet access was restricted. It could have been a condition of the test that was simply ignored (most likely) or it could've been air gapped but was able to access a wifi-enabled device. I would assume mutiple servers were being used…
-
T
"Anthropic insider warns AI could ‘kill all humans’." Sure, great, thanks for the heads up. You know what is definitely is going to kill us all? Climate fucking change. Maybe we could be concerned more about that instead of some fevered nightmare of some incel tech lord buffoons.
- Sep 10
-
It's so weird to me to think we're all going to die from AI but not have any explanation as to how that is going to happen beyond "well the AI will just be really smart and will think of something"
-
G
Is it already too late? https://www. comicsands.com/anthropic-ai-re searcher-coxon-warning?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=infeed&utm_campaign=linkprogram